Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

167 Finding that defendant did the act or made the omission charged

(1) This section applies where in accordance with section 166(4) it is determined by the judge advocate that the defendant is unfit to stand trial. (2) The trial shall not proceed or further proceed but the court must, as respects the charge or each of the charges on which the defendant was to be or was being tried, determine whether it is satisfied that he did the act charged against him as the offence. (3) If as respects that charge or any of those charges the court is so satisfied, it must make a finding that the defendant did the act charged against him. (4) If as respects that charge or any of those charges the court is not so satisfied, it must find the defendant not guilty as if on the charge in question the trial had proceeded to a conclusion. (5) A determination under subsection (2) must be made— (a) on the evidence (if any) already given in the trial; and (b) on such evidence as may be adduced or further adduced by the prosecution, or adduced by a person appointed under this section by the judge advocate to put the case for the defence. (6) Section 160 (Court Martial decisions) does not apply to a determination or finding under this section, but as respects any charge to which subsection (2) above applies— (a) the question whether the court is satisfied as mentioned in that subsection is to be determined by the members of the court other than the judge advocate (“the lay members”); and (b) the court is so satisfied if, on a vote on the question whether they are so satisfied, a majority of the lay members are in favour. (7) In this section “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

Your change, as a redline

167 Finding that defendant did the act or made the omission charged

(1) This section applies where in accordance with section 166(4) it is determined by the judge advocate that the defendant is unfit to stand trial. (2) The trial shall not proceed or further proceed but the court must, as respects the charge or each of the charges on which the defendant was to be or was being tried, determine whether it is satisfied that he did the act charged against him as the offence. (3) If as respects that charge or any of those charges the court is so satisfied, it must make a finding that the defendant did the act charged against him. (4) If as respects that charge or any of those charges the court is not so satisfied, it must find the defendant not guilty as if on the charge in question the trial had proceeded to a conclusion. (5) A determination under subsection (2) must be made— (a) on the evidence (if any) already given in the trial; and (b) on such evidence as may be adduced or further adduced by the prosecution, or adduced by a person appointed under this section by the judge advocate to put the case for the defence. (6) Section 160 (Court Martial decisions) does not apply to a determination or finding under this section, but as respects any charge to which subsection (2) above applies— (a) the question whether the court is satisfied as mentioned in that subsection is to be determined by the members of the court other than the judge advocate (“the lay members”); and (b) the court is so satisfied if, on a vote on the question whether they are so satisfied, a majority of the lay members are in favour. (7) In this section “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds