Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

168 Findings of insanity

(1) This section applies where on the trial of a person by the Court Martial the court is satisfied, as respects the charge or any of the charges on which he is being tried, that— (a) the defendant did the act charged against him as the offence; but (b) at the time of that act he was insane. (2) The court must find that the defendant was not guilty of that offence by reason of insanity. (3) No finding under this section may be made except on the written or oral evidence of two or more registered medical practitioners at least one of whom is duly approved within the meaning given by section 172. (4) Section 160 (Court Martial decisions) does not apply to a determination or finding under this section, but— (a) the question whether the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) above is to be determined by the members of the court other than the judge advocate (“the lay members”); and (b) the court is so satisfied if, on a vote on the question whether they are so satisfied, a majority of the lay members are in favour. (5) In this section “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

Your change, as a redline

168 Findings of insanity

(1) This section applies where on the trial of a person by the Court Martial the court is satisfied, as respects the charge or any of the charges on which he is being tried, that— (a) the defendant did the act charged against him as the offence; but (b) at the time of that act he was insane. (2) The court must find that the defendant was not guilty of that offence by reason of insanity. (3) No finding under this section may be made except on the written or oral evidence of two or more registered medical practitioners at least one of whom is duly approved within the meaning given by section 172. (4) Section 160 (Court Martial decisions) does not apply to a determination or finding under this section, but— (a) the question whether the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) above is to be determined by the members of the court other than the judge advocate (“the lay members”); and (b) the court is so satisfied if, on a vote on the question whether they are so satisfied, a majority of the lay members are in favour. (5) In this section “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds