Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

169 Powers where person unfit to stand trial or not guilty by reason of insanity

(1) This section applies where on a trial by the Court Martial— (a) the defendant is found to be unfit to stand trial and to have done the act charged against him; or (b) the defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity. (2) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), the court must make in respect of the defendant— (a) a hospital order, with or without a restriction order; (b) a service supervision order (defined by section 170); or (c) an order discharging him absolutely. (3) In this section— “hospital order” means an order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (c. 20) (“the 1983 Act”) as modified by Schedule 4 to this Act; “restriction order” means an order under section 41 of that Act as so modified. (4) The power to make a hospital order by virtue of this section is not exercisable unless the conditions in subsections (1)(b) and (2) of section 37 of the 1983 Act, as modified by Schedule 4 to this Act, are satisfied. (5) Where— (a) the finding mentioned in subsection (1) relates to an offence the sentence for which is fixed by law, and (b) the court has power to make a hospital order, the court must make a hospital order with a restriction order (whether or not it would have power to make a restriction order apart from this subsection). (6) The functions of the court under this section, and any functions under the 1983 Act that are exercisable by the court by reason of this section or Schedule 4, are to be exercised by— (a) the judge advocate for the trial mentioned in subsection (1); or (b) in a case where that judge advocate has made an interim hospital order under section 38 of the 1983 Act as modified by Schedule 4, by that or any other judge advocate. (7) In subsection (1) “act” includes an omission and the reference to the doing of an act is to be read accordingly. (8) Schedule 4 (modifications of the 1983 Act) has effect.

Your change, as a redline

169 Powers where person unfit to stand trial or not guilty by reason of insanity

(1) This section applies where on a trial by the Court Martial— (a) the defendant is found to be unfit to stand trial and to have done the act charged against him; or (b) the defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity. (2) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), the court must make in respect of the defendant— (a) a hospital order, with or without a restriction order; (b) a service supervision order (defined by section 170); or (c) an order discharging him absolutely. (3) In this section— “hospital order” means an order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (c. 20) (“the 1983 Act”) as modified by Schedule 4 to this Act; “restriction order” means an order under section 41 of that Act as so modified. (4) The power to make a hospital order by virtue of this section is not exercisable unless the conditions in subsections (1)(b) and (2) of section 37 of the 1983 Act, as modified by Schedule 4 to this Act, are satisfied. (5) Where— (a) the finding mentioned in subsection (1) relates to an offence the sentence for which is fixed by law, and (b) the court has power to make a hospital order, the court must make a hospital order with a restriction order (whether or not it would have power to make a restriction order apart from this subsection). (6) The functions of the court under this section, and any functions under the 1983 Act that are exercisable by the court by reason of this section or Schedule 4, are to be exercised by— (a) the judge advocate for the trial mentioned in subsection (1); or (b) in a case where that judge advocate has made an interim hospital order under section 38 of the 1983 Act as modified by Schedule 4, by that or any other judge advocate. (7) In subsection (1) “act” includes an omission and the reference to the doing of an act is to be read accordingly. (8) Schedule 4 (modifications of the 1983 Act) has effect.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds