Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

238 Deciding the seriousness of an offence

(1) A court or officer dealing with an offender for a service offence (“the current offence”) must in considering the seriousness of the offence— (a) consider the offender's culpability in committing the offence and any harm which the offence caused, was intended to cause or could foreseeably have caused; (b) if the offender has one or more previous convictions, treat as an aggravating factor each previous conviction that the court or officer considers can reasonably be so treated; (c) if the offender committed the current offence while— (i) charged with another service offence and released from service custody, or (ii) on bail, treat the fact that it was committed in those circumstances as an aggravating factor. (2) In considering whether a previous conviction can reasonably be treated as an aggravating factor the court or officer must have regard (in particular) to— (a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and (b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction. (3) Any reference in subsection (1) or (2) to a previous conviction is to be read as a reference to— (a) a previous conviction of a service offence; ... or (b) a previous conviction by a court in the British Islands of an offence other than a service offence. (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) Nothing in this section prevents the court or officer from treating a previous conviction by a court outside the British Islands as an aggravating factor in any case where the court or officer considers it appropriate to do so. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In section 69 of the Sentencing Code (seriousness of offence with terrorist connection)— (a) the references to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for an offence under section 42, and (b) the reference in subsection (1) to an offence specified in Schedule 1 to that Code is to be read as a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is an offence specified in Schedule 1. (7) In section 69A of the Sentencing Code (seriousness of offence where foreign power or designated body condition met)— (a) the references in that section to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for a service offence, and (b) the reference in subsection (1)(b) to an offence which is not an offence listed in subsection (2) is to be taken as a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is not an offence so listed. (8) In section 70A of the Sentencing Code (sexual grooming of child as aggravating factor)— (a) the references in that section to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for a service offence, and (b) the reference in subsection (1) to a specified child sex offence is to be read as including a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a specified child sex offence.

Your change, as a redline

238 Deciding the seriousness of an offence

(1) A court or officer dealing with an offender for a service offence (“the current offence”) must in considering the seriousness of the offence— (a) consider the offender's culpability in committing the offence and any harm which the offence caused, was intended to cause or could foreseeably have caused; (b) if the offender has one or more previous convictions, treat as an aggravating factor each previous conviction that the court or officer considers can reasonably be so treated; (c) if the offender committed the current offence while— (i) charged with another service offence and released from service custody, or (ii) on bail, treat the fact that it was committed in those circumstances as an aggravating factor. (2) In considering whether a previous conviction can reasonably be treated as an aggravating factor the court or officer must have regard (in particular) to— (a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and (b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction. (3) Any reference in subsection (1) or (2) to a previous conviction is to be read as a reference to— (a) a previous conviction of a service offence; ... or (b) a previous conviction by a court in the British Islands of an offence other than a service offence. (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) Nothing in this section prevents the court or officer from treating a previous conviction by a court outside the British Islands as an aggravating factor in any case where the court or officer considers it appropriate to do so. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) In section 69 of the Sentencing Code (seriousness of offence with terrorist connection)— (a) the references to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for an offence under section 42, and (b) the reference in subsection (1) to an offence specified in Schedule 1 to that Code is to be read as a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is an offence specified in Schedule 1. (7) In section 69A of the Sentencing Code (seriousness of offence where foreign power or designated body condition met)— (a) the references in that section to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for a service offence, and (b) the reference in subsection (1)(b) to an offence which is not an offence listed in subsection (2) is to be taken as a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is not an offence so listed. (8) In section 70A of the Sentencing Code (sexual grooming of child as aggravating factor)— (a) the references in that section to a court are to be read as including a court dealing with an offender for a service offence, and (b) the reference in subsection (1) to a specified child sex offence is to be read as including a reference to an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is a specified child sex offence.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds