Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

279 Court must consider whether trial by Court Martial more appropriate

(1) Before arraignment, the Service Civilian Court must decide whether it or the Court Martial should try the charge. (2) Before making a decision under this section, the court must— (a) give the Director of Service Prosecutions (“the Director”) an opportunity to inform the court of the defendant's previous convictions (if any); and (b) give the Director and the defendant an opportunity to make representations as to whether the Service Civilian Court or the Court Martial should try the charge. (3) In making a decision under this section, the court must consider— (a) the nature of the case; (b) the seriousness of the offence; (c) whether its powers of punishment in respect of the offence would be adequate; (d) any other circumstances it considers to be relevant; and (e) any representations made by the Director and the defendant. (4) If the court decides that the charge should be tried by the Court Martial— (a) it must refer the charge to that court; and (b) the charge is to be regarded for the purposes of Part 5 as allocated for Court Martial trial. (5) Section 238(3) (meaning of “previous conviction”) applies for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) above.

Your change, as a redline

279 Court must consider whether trial by Court Martial more appropriate

(1) Before arraignment, the Service Civilian Court must decide whether it or the Court Martial should try the charge. (2) Before making a decision under this section, the court must— (a) give the Director of Service Prosecutions (“the Director”) an opportunity to inform the court of the defendant's previous convictions (if any); and (b) give the Director and the defendant an opportunity to make representations as to whether the Service Civilian Court or the Court Martial should try the charge. (3) In making a decision under this section, the court must consider— (a) the nature of the case; (b) the seriousness of the offence; (c) whether its powers of punishment in respect of the offence would be adequate; (d) any other circumstances it considers to be relevant; and (e) any representations made by the Director and the defendant. (4) If the court decides that the charge should be tried by the Court Martial— (a) it must refer the charge to that court; and (b) the charge is to be regarded for the purposes of Part 5 as allocated for Court Martial trial. (5) Section 238(3) (meaning of “previous conviction”) applies for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) above.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds