Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

305 Random drug testing

(1) A drug testing officer may, in order for it to be ascertained whether or to what extent a person subject to service law has or has had drugs in his body, require the person to provide a sample of his urine for analysis. (2) A drug testing officer may not impose a requirement under subsection (1) if— (a) he or his commanding officer is the person's commanding officer; or (b) the sample is sought in connection with an investigation under this Act of an offence .... (3) A person commits an offence if he fails to comply with a requirement imposed under subsection (1). (4) In this section— “drug” means a controlled drug as defined by section 2 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (c. 38); and “drug testing officer” means an officer, warrant officer or non-commissioned officer who is authorised by or in accordance with regulations made by the Defence Council for the purpose of obtaining samples for analysis for drugs. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable to any punishment mentioned in the Table in section 164, but any sentence of imprisonment ... imposed in respect of the offence must not exceed six months.

Your change, as a redline

305 Random drug testing

(1) A drug testing officer may, in order for it to be ascertained whether or to what extent a person subject to service law has or has had drugs in his body, require the person to provide a sample of his urine for analysis. (2) A drug testing officer may not impose a requirement under subsection (1) if— (a) he or his commanding officer is the person's commanding officer; or (b) the sample is sought in connection with an investigation under this Act of an offence .... (3) A person commits an offence if he fails to comply with a requirement imposed under subsection (1). (4) In this section— “drug” means a controlled drug as defined by section 2 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (c. 38); and “drug testing officer” means an officer, warrant officer or non-commissioned officer who is authorised by or in accordance with regulations made by the Defence Council for the purpose of obtaining samples for analysis for drugs. (5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable to any punishment mentioned in the Table in section 164, but any sentence of imprisonment ... imposed in respect of the offence must not exceed six months.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds