Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

33 Dangerous flying etc

(1) A person subject to service law commits an offence if— (a) he does an act— (i) when flying or using an aircraft, or (ii) in relation to an aircraft or aircraft material, that causes or is likely to cause loss of life or injury to any person; and (b) either— (i) he intends to cause loss of life or injury to any person, and there is no lawful excuse for his act; or (ii) he is reckless as to whether he causes loss of life or injury to any person. (2) A person subject to service law commits an offence if, negligently, he does an act— (a) when flying or using an aircraft, or (b) in relation to an aircraft or aircraft material, that causes or is likely to cause loss of life or injury to any person. (3) In this section— “act” includes an omission and the reference to the doing of an act is to be read accordingly; “aircraft material” includes— parts of and accessories for aircraft (whether or not for the time being in aircraft); armaments in or for use in aircraft; any other equipment or instrument in or for use in aircraft; any equipment for use in connection with the taking-off or landing of aircraft or for detecting the movement of aircraft; any fuel for the propulsion of aircraft; and any lubricant for aircraft or for anything within any of paragraphs (a) to (d). (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable to any punishment mentioned in the Table in section 164, and any sentence of imprisonment imposed in respect of the offence— (a) in the case of an offence under subsection (1), may be for life; (b) in the case of an offence under subsection (2), must not exceed two years.

Your change, as a redline

33 Dangerous flying etc

(1) A person subject to service law commits an offence if— (a) he does an act— (i) when flying or using an aircraft, or (ii) in relation to an aircraft or aircraft material, that causes or is likely to cause loss of life or injury to any person; and (b) either— (i) he intends to cause loss of life or injury to any person, and there is no lawful excuse for his act; or (ii) he is reckless as to whether he causes loss of life or injury to any person. (2) A person subject to service law commits an offence if, negligently, he does an act— (a) when flying or using an aircraft, or (b) in relation to an aircraft or aircraft material, that causes or is likely to cause loss of life or injury to any person. (3) In this section— “act” includes an omission and the reference to the doing of an act is to be read accordingly; “aircraft material” includes— parts of and accessories for aircraft (whether or not for the time being in aircraft); armaments in or for use in aircraft; any other equipment or instrument in or for use in aircraft; any equipment for use in connection with the taking-off or landing of aircraft or for detecting the movement of aircraft; any fuel for the propulsion of aircraft; and any lubricant for aircraft or for anything within any of paragraphs (a) to (d). (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable to any punishment mentioned in the Table in section 164, and any sentence of imprisonment imposed in respect of the offence— (a) in the case of an offence under subsection (1), may be for life; (b) in the case of an offence under subsection (2), must not exceed two years.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds