Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

340D Appeals

(1) Service complaints regulations must make provision enabling the complainant in relation to a service complaint to appeal to the Defence Council against a decision on the complaint, where the decision was taken by a person or panel appointed by virtue of section 340C(1)(a). (2) The regulations may make provision— (a) about the way in which an appeal is to be brought (including about the information to be provided by the complainant); (aa) restricting the grounds on which an appeal against a decision on a complaint (or on a complaint of a description specified in the regulations) may be brought; (b) that an appeal may not be brought, except in circumstances specified in the regulations, after the end of the period so specified; (c) requiring the Defence Council to decide any question relating to whether an appeal has been brought before the end of the period referred to in paragraph (b) or (if not) whether circumstances referred to in that paragraph apply; (ca) requiring the Defence Council to decide any question relating to whether an appeal has been brought on valid grounds; (d) requiring the Defence Council to decide whether an appeal is to be determined— (i) by a person or panel of persons appointed by the Council, or (ii) by the Council themselves. (3) The period referred to in subsection (2)(b) must be at least two weeks beginning with the day on which the complainant received notification of the decision appealed against. (4) The Defence Council must not appoint a person or panel to determine an appeal unless— (a) the person is, or all the persons on the panel are, authorised by the Council to determine the appeal and to grant appropriate redress, or (b) the Council propose to authorise that person or those persons for those purposes. (5) Provision made by virtue of subsection (2)(d) is subject to regulations made under section 340E(1) (eligibility for appointment, requirements relating to independent decision-making, etc). (6) Service complaints regulations must make provision— (a) for the Armed Forces Commissioner, on an application by the complainant, to review a decision by the Defence Council that an appeal cannot be proceeded with because— (i) it was not brought before the end of the period referred to in subsection (2)(b), and (ii) the case is not one in which circumstances referred to in that provision apply; (aa) for the Armed Forces Commissioner, on an application by the complainant, to review a decision by the Defence Council that an appeal cannot be proceeded with because it was not brought on a valid ground; (b) for securing that the decision of the Commissioner, on a review such as is mentioned in paragraph (a) or (aa), is binding on the complainant and the Defence Council.

Your change, as a redline

340D Appeals

(1) Service complaints regulations must make provision enabling the complainant in relation to a service complaint to appeal to the Defence Council against a decision on the complaint, where the decision was taken by a person or panel appointed by virtue of section 340C(1)(a). (2) The regulations may make provision— (a) about the way in which an appeal is to be brought (including about the information to be provided by the complainant); (aa) restricting the grounds on which an appeal against a decision on a complaint (or on a complaint of a description specified in the regulations) may be brought; (b) that an appeal may not be brought, except in circumstances specified in the regulations, after the end of the period so specified; (c) requiring the Defence Council to decide any question relating to whether an appeal has been brought before the end of the period referred to in paragraph (b) or (if not) whether circumstances referred to in that paragraph apply; (ca) requiring the Defence Council to decide any question relating to whether an appeal has been brought on valid grounds; (d) requiring the Defence Council to decide whether an appeal is to be determined— (i) by a person or panel of persons appointed by the Council, or (ii) by the Council themselves. (3) The period referred to in subsection (2)(b) must be at least two weeks beginning with the day on which the complainant received notification of the decision appealed against. (4) The Defence Council must not appoint a person or panel to determine an appeal unless— (a) the person is, or all the persons on the panel are, authorised by the Council to determine the appeal and to grant appropriate redress, or (b) the Council propose to authorise that person or those persons for those purposes. (5) Provision made by virtue of subsection (2)(d) is subject to regulations made under section 340E(1) (eligibility for appointment, requirements relating to independent decision-making, etc). (6) Service complaints regulations must make provision— (a) for the Armed Forces Commissioner, on an application by the complainant, to review a decision by the Defence Council that an appeal cannot be proceeded with because— (i) it was not brought before the end of the period referred to in subsection (2)(b), and (ii) the case is not one in which circumstances referred to in that provision apply; (aa) for the Armed Forces Commissioner, on an application by the complainant, to review a decision by the Defence Council that an appeal cannot be proceeded with because it was not brought on a valid ground; (b) for securing that the decision of the Commissioner, on a review such as is mentioned in paragraph (a) or (aa), is binding on the complainant and the Defence Council.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds