Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

340K Obstruction and contempt

(1) This section applies if a person— (a) without lawful excuse, obstructs the discharge of any of the Armed Forces Commissioner’s functions relating to an investigation under section 340H or 340IA, or (b) does any act in relation to an investigation that would constitute contempt of court if the investigation were proceedings in the High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session). (2) The Commissioner may certify the obstruction or act to the High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session). (3) The court may inquire into the certified obstruction or act. (4) If the court, having heard any witness on behalf of or against the person and any statement in the person's defence, is satisfied that the person— (a) without lawful excuse, obstructed the discharge of any of the Commissioner’s functions relating to the investigation, or (b) did the act referred to in subsection (1)(b), it may deal with the person in any way in which it could deal with the person if he or she had committed contempt in relation to the court. (5) In this section, “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

Your change, as a redline

340K Obstruction and contempt

(1) This section applies if a person— (a) without lawful excuse, obstructs the discharge of any of the Armed Forces Commissioner’s functions relating to an investigation under section 340H or 340IA, or (b) does any act in relation to an investigation that would constitute contempt of court if the investigation were proceedings in the High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session). (2) The Commissioner may certify the obstruction or act to the High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session). (3) The court may inquire into the certified obstruction or act. (4) If the court, having heard any witness on behalf of or against the person and any statement in the person's defence, is satisfied that the person— (a) without lawful excuse, obstructed the discharge of any of the Commissioner’s functions relating to the investigation, or (b) did the act referred to in subsection (1)(b), it may deal with the person in any way in which it could deal with the person if he or she had committed contempt in relation to the court. (5) In this section, “act” includes an omission and references to the doing of an act are to be read accordingly.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds