Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

340N Referral of certain allegations

(1) Where the Armed Forces Commissioner considers that a communication made to the Commissioner alleges that a person named in the communication— (a) is subject to service law and has been wronged in any matter relating to his or her service, or (b) was wronged in any matter relating to his or her service which occurred while the person was subject to service law, the Commissioner may refer the allegation to the appropriate officer. (2) “The appropriate officer” is the officer whom the Commissioner considers to be the officer to whom a service complaint made by the person in respect of the alleged wrong is (under service complaints regulations) to be made. (3) If an allegation is referred under subsection (1), the appropriate officer must as soon as is reasonably practicable— (a) inform the person that the allegation has been so referred, (b) ensure that the person is aware of— (i) the procedure for making a service complaint, and (ii) the effect on the making of service complaints of provision made by virtue of section 340B(2)(c) (time limit), and (c) ascertain whether the person wishes to make a service complaint in respect of the alleged wrong. (4) Regulations made by the Secretary of State must make provision— (a) about matters that must be notified to the Commissioner where an allegation is referred under subsection (1), and (b) about the time by which notification must be given.

Your change, as a redline

340N Referral of certain allegations

(1) Where the Armed Forces Commissioner considers that a communication made to the Commissioner alleges that a person named in the communication— (a) is subject to service law and has been wronged in any matter relating to his or her service, or (b) was wronged in any matter relating to his or her service which occurred while the person was subject to service law, the Commissioner may refer the allegation to the appropriate officer. (2) “The appropriate officer” is the officer whom the Commissioner considers to be the officer to whom a service complaint made by the person in respect of the alleged wrong is (under service complaints regulations) to be made. (3) If an allegation is referred under subsection (1), the appropriate officer must as soon as is reasonably practicable— (a) inform the person that the allegation has been so referred, (b) ensure that the person is aware of— (i) the procedure for making a service complaint, and (ii) the effect on the making of service complaints of provision made by virtue of section 340B(2)(c) (time limit), and (c) ascertain whether the person wishes to make a service complaint in respect of the alleged wrong. (4) Regulations made by the Secretary of State must make provision— (a) about matters that must be notified to the Commissioner where an allegation is referred under subsection (1), and (b) about the time by which notification must be given.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds