Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

63 Service proceedings barring subsequent service proceedings

(1) This section applies where a person— (a) has been convicted or acquitted of a service offence; or (b) has had a service offence taken into consideration when being sentenced; and in this section “offence A” means the offence mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b). (2) The Court Martial may not try that person for an offence (“offence B”) if— (a) offence B is the same offence in law as offence A, or subsection (3) applies; and (b) the alleged facts on which the charge in respect of offence B is based are the same, or substantially the same, as those on which the charge in respect of offence A was based. (3) This subsection applies if— (a) the person was convicted of offence A, or offence A was taken into consideration, and offence B is an offence all of whose elements are elements of offence A; (b) the person was acquitted of offence A and offence B is an offence whose elements include all the elements of offence A; or (c) the person was convicted or acquitted of offence A by the Court Martial or the Service Civilian Court and offence B is an offence of which under section 161 (alternative offences) he could have been convicted on acquittal of offence A. (4) Where offence A is an offence taken into consideration which was not charged, the reference in subsection (2)(b) to the facts on which the charge in respect of offence A was based is to be read as a reference to the facts on which a charge in respect of offence A would have been based. (5) Where by reason of this section a person cannot be tried by the Court Martial for an offence— (a) the Service Civilian Court may not try him for that offence; and (b) a charge against him in respect of that offence may not be heard summarily by an officer.

Your change, as a redline

63 Service proceedings barring subsequent service proceedings

(1) This section applies where a person— (a) has been convicted or acquitted of a service offence; or (b) has had a service offence taken into consideration when being sentenced; and in this section “offence A” means the offence mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b). (2) The Court Martial may not try that person for an offence (“offence B”) if— (a) offence B is the same offence in law as offence A, or subsection (3) applies; and (b) the alleged facts on which the charge in respect of offence B is based are the same, or substantially the same, as those on which the charge in respect of offence A was based. (3) This subsection applies if— (a) the person was convicted of offence A, or offence A was taken into consideration, and offence B is an offence all of whose elements are elements of offence A; (b) the person was acquitted of offence A and offence B is an offence whose elements include all the elements of offence A; or (c) the person was convicted or acquitted of offence A by the Court Martial or the Service Civilian Court and offence B is an offence of which under section 161 (alternative offences) he could have been convicted on acquittal of offence A. (4) Where offence A is an offence taken into consideration which was not charged, the reference in subsection (2)(b) to the facts on which the charge in respect of offence A was based is to be read as a reference to the facts on which a charge in respect of offence A would have been based. (5) Where by reason of this section a person cannot be tried by the Court Martial for an offence— (a) the Service Civilian Court may not try him for that offence; and (b) a charge against him in respect of that offence may not be heard summarily by an officer.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds