Police Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Collaboration agreements involving police forces
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) Force collaboration provision may, in particular, consist of provision— (a) for the joint discharge of functions by members of police forces; (b) for members of a police force to discharge functions in another force's area; (c) for members of a police force to be provided to another force. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) A collaboration agreement may provide for a member of a police force, or a civilian employee, to be under the direction and control of a chief officer specified in or determined in accordance with the agreement. (5) A chief officer may make a collaboration agreement only if the chief officer thinks that the agreement is in the interests of the efficiency or effectiveness of one or more police forces. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23 Collaboration agreements involving police forces
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) Force collaboration provision may, in particular, consist of provision— (a) for the joint discharge of functions by members of police forces; (b) for members of a police force to discharge functions in another force's area; (c) for members of a police force to be provided to another force. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) A collaboration agreement may provide for a member of a police force, or a civilian employee, to be under the direction and control of a chief officer specified in or determined in accordance with the agreement. (5) A chief officer may make a collaboration agreement only if the chief officer thinks that the agreement is in the interests of the efficiency or effectiveness of one or more police forces. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.