Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Policing body collaboration provision, or policing body & force collaboration provision, may, in particular, consist of provision—
(a) for support to be provided jointly by two or more policing bodies;
(b) for support to be provided for two or more policing bodies or forces jointly;
(c) for a policing body to provide support to another policing body or to a force maintained by another policing body.
(3) In relation to policing body collaboration provision, or policing body & force collaboration provision, references to the provision of support include, in particular, the provision of—
(a) premises;
(b) equipment;
(c) staff;
(d) services;
(e) facilities.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) A policing body may make a collaboration agreement only if it thinks that the agreement is in the interests of the efficiency or effectiveness of one or more policing bodies or police forces.
(6) A policing body must consult the chief officer of police of the police force which the body is responsible for maintaining before making a collaboration agreement (unless that chief officer is a party to the agreement).
(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Policing body collaboration provision, or policing body & force collaboration provision, may, in particular, consist of provision—
(a) for support to be provided jointly by two or more policing bodies;
(b) for support to be provided for two or more policing bodies or forces jointly;
(c) for a policing body to provide support to another policing body or to a force maintained by another policing body.
(3) In relation to policing body collaboration provision, or policing body & force collaboration provision, references to the provision of support include, in particular, the provision of—
(a) premises;
(b) equipment;
(c) staff;
(d) services;
(e) facilities.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) A policing body may make a collaboration agreement only if it thinks that the agreement is in the interests of the efficiency or effectiveness of one or more policing bodies or police forces.
(6) A policing body must consult the chief officer of police of the police force which the body is responsible for maintaining before making a collaboration agreement (unless that chief officer is a party to the agreement).
(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.