Agricultural Tenancies Act 1995
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
28 Resolution of disputes.
(1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5) below and to section 29 of this Act, any dispute between the landlord and the tenant under a farm business tenancy, being a dispute concerning their rights and obligations under this Act, under the terms of the tenancy or under any custom, shall be determined by arbitration. (2) Where such a dispute has arisen, the landlord or the tenant may give notice in writing to the other specifying the dispute and stating that, unless before the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which the notice is given the parties have appointed an arbitrator by agreement, he proposes to apply to a professional authority for the appointment of an arbitrator by that authority. (3) Where a notice has been given under subsection (2) above, but no arbitrator has been appointed by agreement, either party may, after the end of the period of two months referred to in that subsection, apply to a professional authority for the appointment of an arbitrator by that authority. (3A) A party may not make an application to a professional authority under subsection (3) above in relation to a dispute if the other party has already made an application to a professional authority under that subsection in relation to that dispute. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) Subsections (1) to (3) above do not apply in relation to— (za) a request made under section 8A(2) of this Act, (a) the determination of rent in pursuance of a statutory review notice (as defined in section 10(1) of this Act), (b) any case falling within section 19(1) of this Act, ... (c) any claim for compensation under Part III of this Act , or (d) any dispute relating to rent review, in any case where Part II of this Act is excluded by virtue of section 9(c)(ii) of this Act.
28 Resolution of disputes.
(1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5) below and to section 29 of this Act, any dispute between the landlord and the tenant under a farm business tenancy, being a dispute concerning their rights and obligations under this Act, under the terms of the tenancy or under any custom, shall be determined by arbitration. (2) Where such a dispute has arisen, the landlord or the tenant may give notice in writing to the other specifying the dispute and stating that, unless before the end of the period of two months beginning with the day on which the notice is given the parties have appointed an arbitrator by agreement, he proposes to apply to a professional authority for the appointment of an arbitrator by that authority. (3) Where a notice has been given under subsection (2) above, but no arbitrator has been appointed by agreement, either party may, after the end of the period of two months referred to in that subsection, apply to a professional authority for the appointment of an arbitrator by that authority. (3A) A party may not make an application to a professional authority under subsection (3) above in relation to a dispute if the other party has already made an application to a professional authority under that subsection in relation to that dispute. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) Subsections (1) to (3) above do not apply in relation to— (za) a request made under section 8A(2) of this Act, (a) the determination of rent in pursuance of a statutory review notice (as defined in section 10(1) of this Act), (b) any case falling within section 19(1) of this Act, ... (c) any claim for compensation under Part III of this Act , or (d) any dispute relating to rent review, in any case where Part II of this Act is excluded by virtue of section 9(c)(ii) of this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.