Propose a change

The Trade Remedies (Increase in Imports as a Result of a Free Trade Agreement Causing Serious Injury to UK Producers) Regulations 2024

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

33 The conduct of reviews

(1) Where the TRA considers it appropriate to expand or limit the matters to be considered in a review, the TRA must make a recommendation to the Secretary of State, setting out the reasons for their recommendation. (2) The TRA must provide interested parties and the Secretary of State with an opportunity to comment prior to making a recommendation to the Secretary of State under paragraph (1). (3) When the Secretary of State receives a recommendation under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State must— (a) determine whether the matters to be considered in the review are to be expanded or limited, and (b) notify the TRA of the determination. (4) The TRA must terminate a review on the request of the Secretary of State. (5) Where the TRA terminates a review under this regulation, it must— (a) publish a notice of termination, containing the information referred to in paragraph 9 of Schedule 1; (b) notify interested parties and contributors. (6) Where the TRA completes a review and determines that the definitive bilateral safeguarding remedy should be maintained in accordance with its terms— (a) the TRA must notify the Secretary of State of the determination; (b) the notice must contain the information set out in paragraph 10 of Schedule 1; (c) the Secretary of State must notify interested parties that no change will be made to the definitive bilateral safeguarding remedy. (7) Parts 2 to 5 apply to a review to the extent that the TRA considers relevant. (8) If the TRA applies any part of Parts 2 to 5 to a review, any references in those Parts to “goods concerned” should be read as “goods subject to review”.

Your change, as a redline

33 The conduct of reviews

(1) Where the TRA considers it appropriate to expand or limit the matters to be considered in a review, the TRA must make a recommendation to the Secretary of State, setting out the reasons for their recommendation. (2) The TRA must provide interested parties and the Secretary of State with an opportunity to comment prior to making a recommendation to the Secretary of State under paragraph (1). (3) When the Secretary of State receives a recommendation under paragraph (1), the Secretary of State must— (a) determine whether the matters to be considered in the review are to be expanded or limited, and (b) notify the TRA of the determination. (4) The TRA must terminate a review on the request of the Secretary of State. (5) Where the TRA terminates a review under this regulation, it must— (a) publish a notice of termination, containing the information referred to in paragraph 9 of Schedule 1; (b) notify interested parties and contributors. (6) Where the TRA completes a review and determines that the definitive bilateral safeguarding remedy should be maintained in accordance with its terms— (a) the TRA must notify the Secretary of State of the determination; (b) the notice must contain the information set out in paragraph 10 of Schedule 1; (c) the Secretary of State must notify interested parties that no change will be made to the definitive bilateral safeguarding remedy. (7) Parts 2 to 5 apply to a review to the extent that the TRA considers relevant. (8) If the TRA applies any part of Parts 2 to 5 to a review, any references in those Parts to “goods concerned” should be read as “goods subject to review”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds