The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Amendment to regulation 41 (outcome of misconduct proceedings)
In regulation 41— (a) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) Where the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings finds that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, they must impose disciplinary action in accordance with paragraph (2) or (3) as appropriate. (1A) Where the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings finds that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to neither misconduct nor gross misconduct, they must— (a) direct that the matter is referred to be dealt with under the reflective practice review process, or (b) take no further action. ; (b) in paragraph (3)(b) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) substitute— (i) dismissal without notice, or (ii) if the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify it— (aa) a final written warning, or (bb) reduction in rank. ; (c) in paragraphs (10) and (12), for “persons” substitute “person or panel”.
10 Amendment to regulation 41 (outcome of misconduct proceedings)
In regulation 41— (a) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) Where the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings finds that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, they must impose disciplinary action in accordance with paragraph (2) or (3) as appropriate. (1A) Where the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings finds that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to neither misconduct nor gross misconduct, they must— (a) direct that the matter is referred to be dealt with under the reflective practice review process, or (b) take no further action. ; (b) in paragraph (3)(b) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) substitute— (i) dismissal without notice, or (ii) if the person or panel conducting the misconduct proceedings is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify it— (aa) a final written warning, or (bb) reduction in rank. ; (c) in paragraphs (10) and (12), for “persons” substitute “person or panel”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.