The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Amendment to regulation 49 (referral of case to accelerated misconduct hearing)
In regulation 49— (a) before paragraph (1), insert— (A1) In this regulation, the “special conditions” are that— (a) there is sufficient evidence, in the form of written statements or other documents, to establish on the balance of probabilities that the conduct of the officer concerned constitutes gross misconduct, and (b) it is in the public interest for the officer concerned to cease to be an MDP officer without delay. (A2) Subject to paragraph (A3), after receipt of the investigator’s report under regulation 20(1), the relevant authority may at any time determine whether the special conditions are satisfied. (A3) Where the case is referred to misconduct proceedings, the relevant authority must not make a determination under paragraph (A2) on or after the date of the misconduct meeting or misconduct hearing. ; (b) omit paragraph (2).
11 Amendment to regulation 49 (referral of case to accelerated misconduct hearing)
In regulation 49— (a) before paragraph (1), insert— (A1) In this regulation, the “special conditions” are that— (a) there is sufficient evidence, in the form of written statements or other documents, to establish on the balance of probabilities that the conduct of the officer concerned constitutes gross misconduct, and (b) it is in the public interest for the officer concerned to cease to be an MDP officer without delay. (A2) Subject to paragraph (A3), after receipt of the investigator’s report under regulation 20(1), the relevant authority may at any time determine whether the special conditions are satisfied. (A3) Where the case is referred to misconduct proceedings, the relevant authority must not make a determination under paragraph (A2) on or after the date of the misconduct meeting or misconduct hearing. ; (b) omit paragraph (2).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.