The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026

20 Insertion of paragraphs 15A (modification: insertion of Part 3A) and 15B (modification: insertion of regulation 20G)

After paragraph 15 (modification to regulation 20) insert— Modification: insertion of Part 3A 15A The Conduct Regulations are to be read as if after regulation 20 there were inserted— Part 3A Determination as to whether relevant disciplinary proceedings are required and referral Application of Part 3A and interpretation 20A (1) Subject to paragraph (2), this Part applies where— (a) the relevant authority receives an investigator’s report under regulation 20(1); (b) the relevant authority receives a report submitted under paragraph 22 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (final reports on investigations); (c) the relevant authority is required to proceed in accordance with this Part by regulation 49(5) or 50(2); (d) the officer concerned, having been referred to a misconduct hearing on the basis that the officer has a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct, resigns or retires before the date of that hearing; or (e) in a case where relevant disciplinary proceedings have been delayed by virtue of regulation 9(3)— (i) the relevant authority considers that such a hearing would no longer prejudice criminal proceedings, or (ii) criminal proceedings have concluded (whatever the outcome of those proceedings). (2) This Part does not apply where Part 4 applies. (3) In this Part, “relevant disciplinary proceedings” means— (a) a misconduct hearing under Part 4 of these Regulations; (b) an accelerated misconduct hearing under Part 5 of these Regulations. (4) In determining whether any criminal proceedings are concluded for the purposes of paragraph (1)(e)(ii), any right of appeal is to be disregarded. Determination as to whether case to answer etc. 20B (1) As soon as practicable after a condition referred to in regulation 20A(1) (“the relevant condition”) applies, the relevant authority must determine— (a) whether the officer concerned has a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct or whether the officer has no case to answer; (b) where the relevant authority determines that the officer has a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct, whether or not relevant disciplinary proceedings should be brought against the officer concerned; (c) where the relevant authority determines that the officer has no case to answer in respect of gross misconduct, whether there may have been a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that would have justified the bringing of disciplinary proceedings had the officer still been serving. (2) Where the relevant authority fails to make the determination as to the matters set out in paragraph (1) before the end of the period of 15 working days beginning with the first working day after the relevant condition applies, it must notify the officer concerned of the reasons for this. Determination that no case to answer or that relevant disciplinary proceedings will not be brought: next steps 20C (1) Where the relevant authority determines under regulation 20B(1) that the officer concerned has no case to answer in respect of gross misconduct, the relevant authority must, as soon as practicable after it has made the determination— (a) give the officer written notice of that determination, as well as its determination as to whether there may have been a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that would have justified the bringing of disciplinary proceedings had the officer still been serving, and (b) subject to the harm test, give the officer a copy of the investigator's report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer. (2) Where the relevant authority determines under regulation 20B(1) that the officer concerned has a case to answer in respect of gross misconduct but that relevant disciplinary proceedings should not be brought against the officer concerned, the relevant authority must, as soon as practicable after it has made the determination— (a) give the officer written notice of the determination, and (b) subject to the harm test, give the officer a copy of the investigator's report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer. Determination that relevant disciplinary proceedings will be brought: next steps 20D (1) Where the relevant authority determines under regulation 20B(1) that relevant disciplinary proceedings should be brought against the officer concerned, it must take the following steps. (2) The relevant authority must decide if it requires a misconduct hearing. (3) If the relevant authority decides the question in paragraph (2) in the affirmative, it must refer the case to a misconduct hearing. (4) If the relevant authority decides the question in paragraph (2) in the negative, it must give written notice to the officer concerned that the case will be referred to an accelerated misconduct hearing unless, within the period of 10 working days beginning with the first working day after the notification is given, the officer gives the relevant authority written notice that the officer wishes the case to be referred to a misconduct hearing. (5) Notification by the officer concerned under paragraph (4) must be given in accordance with regulation 20F. (6) If the relevant authority is notified that the officer concerned wishes the case to be referred to a misconduct hearing in accordance with paragraph (4), it must refer the case to a misconduct hearing. (7) If the relevant authority is not so notified, it must refer the case to an accelerated misconduct hearing. Late requests for a misconduct hearing 20E (1) Notwithstanding that a case is to be, or has been, referred to an accelerated misconduct hearing under regulation 20D(7), the officer concerned may submit a request to the relevant authority that the case be referred to a misconduct hearing. (2) Such a request is only valid if— (a) it is in writing; (b) it is submitted in accordance with regulation 20F; (c) it explains— (i) why the officer concerned was unable to notify the relevant authority in accordance with regulation 20D(4) that the officer wishes the case to be referred to a misconduct hearing, (ii) the reasons for any subsequent delay in making the request; and (d) the relevant authority receives it before the date of the accelerated misconduct hearing. (3) The relevant authority must forward a valid request to the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing (“the decision maker”) for determination. (4) The decision maker may only grant the request if they are satisfied that— (a) it was not reasonably practicable for the officer concerned to notify the relevant authority in accordance with regulation 20D(4) that the officer wishes the case to be referred to a misconduct hearing, and (b) the officer has submitted their request within a reasonable time after the end of the period of 10 working days referred to in regulation 20D(4). (5) If the decision maker grants the request, they must, as soon as practicable— (a) direct the relevant authority to refer the case to a misconduct hearing, and (b) give the officer concerned written notice of their decision. (6) If the decision maker does not grant the request, they must, as soon as practicable, give the officer concerned written notice of their decision and the reasons for it. Notifications and requests under regulation 20D and 20E: supplementary 20F (1) This regulation applies to— (a) a notice given by the officer concerned to the relevant authority under regulation 20D(4); (b) a request submitted by the officer concerned to the relevant authority under regulation 20E(1). (2) A notification or request to which this regulation applies must be given or submitted to the relevant authority by being— (a) delivered personally to the relevant authority by— (i) the officer concerned, or (ii) if agreed with the officer, the officer’s police friend; (b) sent to the relevant authority’s address by first class post or recorded delivery or other service which provides for delivery on the next working day (“by post”); or (c) sent to the relevant authority by e-mail or other means of electronic communication. (3) Where a notice or request is sent by e-mail or other means of electronic communication, it is to be taken to have been given or supplied to the relevant authority— (a) if the e-mail or other electronic communication is sent on a working day before 4.30 p.m., on that day, or (b) in any other case, on the next working day after the day on which it was sent. (4) Where a notice or request is sent by post, it is to be taken to have been given or supplied to the relevant authority on the second working day after the day on which it was— (a) posted, or (b) left with, delivered to or collected by the relevant service provider. . Modification: insertion of regulation 20G 15B The Conduct Regulations are to be read as if before regulation 21 and after the heading to Part 4 there were inserted— Application of Part 4 20G This Part applies where— (a) the relevant authority has a duty under paragraph 23(5B) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act to comply with a direction to bring misconduct proceedings; (b) the relevant authority accepts a recommendation made under paragraph 25(4C)(c) or (4E)(c) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act that misconduct proceedings of the form specified in the recommendation are brought; (c) the relevant authority has a duty under paragraph 27(4)(b) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act to comply with a direction to give effect to a recommendation to bring misconduct proceedings; (d) the relevant authority has been directed under section 59(5) of the 1998 Act to bring disciplinary proceedings; or (e) a case is referred to a misconduct hearing under regulation 20D(3) or (6) or 20E(5)(a). . .