The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
26 Substitution of paragraph 41 (modification to regulation 49)
For paragraph 41 substitute— Modification to regulation 49 (referral of case to accelerated misconduct hearing) 41 Regulation 49 is to be read as if— (a) at the end of the heading there were inserted “otherwise than under regulation 20D(7)”; (b) in paragraph (A1)(b), for the words from “for the officer concerned” to the end, there were substituted “that the officer concerned should be included in the MDP barred list”; (c) in paragraph (A3) “misconduct meeting or” were omitted; (d) in paragraph (5), in the closing words, for “Part 4” there were substituted “Part 3A”; (e) paragraph (6) were omitted. .
26 Substitution of paragraph 41 (modification to regulation 49)
For paragraph 41 substitute— Modification to regulation 49 (referral of case to accelerated misconduct hearing) 41 Regulation 49 is to be read as if— (a) at the end of the heading there were inserted “otherwise than under regulation 20D(7)”; (b) in paragraph (A1)(b), for the words from “for the officer concerned” to the end, there were substituted “that the officer concerned should be included in the MDP barred list”; (c) in paragraph (A3) “misconduct meeting or” were omitted; (d) in paragraph (5), in the closing words, for “Part 4” there were substituted “Part 3A”; (e) paragraph (6) were omitted. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.