The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
36 Amendment to regulation 3 (interpretation and delegation)
In regulation 3—
(a) in paragraph (1)—
(i) before the definition of “first stage appeal meeting”, insert—
“appeal manager”, in relation to the officer concerned, means the person appointed by the relevant authority to that role for the purposes of these Regulations, being of a rank or level of seniority which is above that of the line manager of the officer;
;
(ii) in the definition of “proposed witness”, for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(iii) omit the definitions of “relevant terms of the final written improvement notice”, “second line manager” and “second stage appeal meeting”;
(iv) in the definition of “second stage meeting”, for “regulation 21(2) or 23(5)(e)” substitute “regulation 29(2) or 31(3)”;
(v) for the definition of “senior manager”, substitute—
“senior manager”, in relation to the officer concerned, means the police officer or staff member appointed by the relevant authority to that role for the purposes of these Regulations, being of at least the same rank or level of seniority as the person who is the appeal manager of the officer;
;
(vi) omit the definition of “third stage meeting”;
(b) in paragraph (4)(d), after sub-paragraph (i) insert—
(ia) MDP staff members;
.
Your change, as a redline
36 Amendment to regulation 3 (interpretation and delegation)
In regulation 3—
(a) in paragraph (1)—
(i) before the definition of “first stage appeal meeting”, insert—
“appeal manager”, in relation to the officer concerned, means the person appointed by the relevant authority to that role for the purposes of these Regulations, being of a rank or level of seniority which is above that of the line manager of the officer;
;
(ii) in the definition of “proposed witness”, for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(iii) omit the definitions of “relevant terms of the final written improvement notice”, “second line manager” and “second stage appeal meeting”;
(iv) in the definition of “second stage meeting”, for “regulation 21(2) or 23(5)(e)” substitute “regulation 29(2) or 31(3)”;
(v) for the definition of “senior manager”, substitute—
“senior manager”, in relation to the officer concerned, means the police officer or staff member appointed by the relevant authority to that role for the purposes of these Regulations, being of at least the same rank or level of seniority as the person who is the appeal manager of the officer;
;
(vi) omit the definition of “third stage meeting”;
(b) in paragraph (4)(d), after sub-paragraph (i) insert—
(ia) MDP staff members;
.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.