The Ministry of Defence Police (Conduct, Performance and Appeals Tribunals) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
43 Amendment to regulation 11 (meeting following investigation by the Director General)
In regulation 11—
(a) in paragraph (1), in the opening words, omit “, (3)”;
(b) in paragraph (2)(b), after “regulation 17(4) or 45(7)(d),” insert “or, where the period of the written improvement notice has been extended under regulation 45(3)(d), within the meaning of regulation 45(8)(c),”;
(c) omit paragraph (3);
(d) in paragraph (6)—
(i) at the end of sub-paragraph (a) insert “and”;
(ii) omit sub-paragraph (b) and the “and” after it;
(iii) in sub-paragraph (c), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(e) in paragraph (7), in the opening words, omit “, 22(2)”;
(f) in paragraph (8)—
(i) in the opening words—
(aa) for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(bb) for “paragraph (3)” substitute “paragraph (2)”;
(cc) omit “final”;
(ii) in sub-paragraph (a), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
Your change, as a redline
43 Amendment to regulation 11 (meeting following investigation by the Director General)
In regulation 11—
(a) in paragraph (1), in the opening words, omit “, (3)”;
(b) in paragraph (2)(b), after “regulation 17(4) or 45(7)(d),” insert “or, where the period of the written improvement notice has been extended under regulation 45(3)(d), within the meaning of regulation 45(8)(c),”;
(c) omit paragraph (3);
(d) in paragraph (6)—
(i) at the end of sub-paragraph (a) insert “and”;
(ii) omit sub-paragraph (b) and the “and” after it;
(iii) in sub-paragraph (c), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(e) in paragraph (7), in the opening words, omit “, 22(2)”;
(f) in paragraph (8)—
(i) in the opening words—
(aa) for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(bb) for “paragraph (3)” substitute “paragraph (2)”;
(cc) omit “final”;
(ii) in sub-paragraph (a), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.