The London Luton Airport Expansion Development Consent Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
45 Application of the 1990 Act
(1) Development consent granted by this Order— (a) which applies to land forming part of the airport; or (b) which authorises works to apparatus of statutory undertakers on, under or over land, is to be treated as specific planning permission for the purposes of section 264(3) (cases in which land is to be treated as not being operational) of the 1990 Act provided development which comprises the airport or apparatus belonging to a statutory undertaker is authorised under this Order and has been carried out on the land in question. (2) To the extent that the LLAOL planning permission or the Green Horizons Park permission or compliance with any conditions of either of those permissions is inconsistent with authorised development which is carried out under this Order, then from the point at which that inconsistency arises— (a) that inconsistency is to be disregarded for the purposes of establishing whether any development which is the subject matter of that planning permission is capable of physical implementation; (b) no enforcement action under the 1990 Act may be taken against development carried out in accordance with that planning permission by reason of such inconsistency, whether inside or outside the Order limits; and (c) any conditions on that planning permission that are inconsistent with this Order or the authorised development cease to have effect. (3) To the extent that development carried out, operated or used in accordance with the grant of planning permission under the 1990 Act that is inconsistent with the authorised development under this Order it is deemed not to constitute a breach of this Order and does not prevent the undertaker carrying out the authorised development granted development consent under this Order. (4) Where the undertaker identifies an inconsistency between a planning permission and this Order which engages the provisions of paragraphs (2)or (3) as the case may be, it must notify the relevant planning authority as soon as reasonably practicable about the existence of the inconsistency, and how the undertaker is proceeding in view of that inconsistency in accordance with this article. (5) In this article— (a) “Green Horizon Park permission” means planning permission reference 17/02300/EIA or any variation of this permission granted under section 96A (power to make non-material changes to planning permission or permission in principle) or section 73 (determination of applications to develop land without compliance with conditions previously attached) of the 1990 Act; (b) “inconsistency” and “cognate expressions” means a circumstance in which a physical conflict exists, or one in which development is no longer capable of being physically implemented or otherwise operated in accordance with the permission or consent granted; and (c) “planning permission” means planning permission granted under the 1990 Act including planning permission deemed to be granted under article 3 (permitted development) and Classes F, G, I, J, K, L, M and N of Part 8 (Transport related development) of Schedule 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015.
45 Application of the 1990 Act
(1) Development consent granted by this Order— (a) which applies to land forming part of the airport; or (b) which authorises works to apparatus of statutory undertakers on, under or over land, is to be treated as specific planning permission for the purposes of section 264(3) (cases in which land is to be treated as not being operational) of the 1990 Act provided development which comprises the airport or apparatus belonging to a statutory undertaker is authorised under this Order and has been carried out on the land in question. (2) To the extent that the LLAOL planning permission or the Green Horizons Park permission or compliance with any conditions of either of those permissions is inconsistent with authorised development which is carried out under this Order, then from the point at which that inconsistency arises— (a) that inconsistency is to be disregarded for the purposes of establishing whether any development which is the subject matter of that planning permission is capable of physical implementation; (b) no enforcement action under the 1990 Act may be taken against development carried out in accordance with that planning permission by reason of such inconsistency, whether inside or outside the Order limits; and (c) any conditions on that planning permission that are inconsistent with this Order or the authorised development cease to have effect. (3) To the extent that development carried out, operated or used in accordance with the grant of planning permission under the 1990 Act that is inconsistent with the authorised development under this Order it is deemed not to constitute a breach of this Order and does not prevent the undertaker carrying out the authorised development granted development consent under this Order. (4) Where the undertaker identifies an inconsistency between a planning permission and this Order which engages the provisions of paragraphs (2)or (3) as the case may be, it must notify the relevant planning authority as soon as reasonably practicable about the existence of the inconsistency, and how the undertaker is proceeding in view of that inconsistency in accordance with this article. (5) In this article— (a) “Green Horizon Park permission” means planning permission reference 17/02300/EIA or any variation of this permission granted under section 96A (power to make non-material changes to planning permission or permission in principle) or section 73 (determination of applications to develop land without compliance with conditions previously attached) of the 1990 Act; (b) “inconsistency” and “cognate expressions” means a circumstance in which a physical conflict exists, or one in which development is no longer capable of being physically implemented or otherwise operated in accordance with the permission or consent granted; and (c) “planning permission” means planning permission granted under the 1990 Act including planning permission deemed to be granted under article 3 (permitted development) and Classes F, G, I, J, K, L, M and N of Part 8 (Transport related development) of Schedule 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.