Propose a change

Registered Designs Act 1949

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

SCHEDULE 1A EUROPEAN COMMUNITY REGISTERED DESIGNS

Section 12A PART 1 Existing registered Community designs Designs registered as Community designs to be treated as registered under the Act 1 (1) A design which, immediately before IP completion day, is entered in the RCD register and has been published in the Community Designs Bulletin as mentioned in Article 73(1) (an “existing registered Community design”) is to be treated on and after IP completion day as if an application for its registration had been made, and it had been registered, under this Act. (2) A registered design which comes into being by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is referred to in this Schedule as a “re-registered design”. (3) This Act applies to a re-registered design as it applies to other registered designs except as otherwise provided in this Schedule. (4) For the purposes of this Act— (a) the date of registration of a re-registered design is the date on which the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives was treated as registered under the Community Design Regulation, and (b) the date of the application of a re-registered design is the date treated, under Article 38, as the date of filing of the application for the registration of the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives. (5) Nothing in this Act authorises the imposition of a fee, or the making of provision by rules or regulations which authorises the imposition of a fee, in respect of any matter relating to a re-registered design (see instead provision made by regulations under Schedule 4 to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). (6) The following provisions of this Act do not apply to a re-registered design— (a) section 7A(6); (b) section 18. (7) In this Schedule— (a) “the RCD register” means the register of registered Community designs maintained under Article 72; (b) “the Community Design Regulation” means Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December 2001 on Community Designs as it had effect immediately before IP completion day. Entries to be made in the register in relation to designs treated as registered under this Act 2 (1) The registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable on or after IP completion day enter a re-registered design in the register of designs. (2) The obligation under section 22(1) (inspection of registered designs) applies to a re-registered design on and after the day on which the re-registered design is entered in the register (notwithstanding that no certificate of registration has been granted). Opt out 3 (1) Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the proprietor of an existing registered Community design may at any time on or after IP completion day serve a notice on the registrar that the design is not to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act. (2) A notice under sub-paragraph (1) may not be served where on or after IP completion day— (a) the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design (or any interest in it)— (i) has been assigned or otherwise transferred except by an assent by personal representatives, or (ii) has had an interest created in it by a mortgage, licence or other instrument; or (b) proceedings based on the re-registered design have been initiated by the proprietor or with the proprietor's consent. (3) A notice served under sub-paragraph (1) must— (a) identify the existing registered Community design; and (b) include the name and address of any person having an interest in the existing registered Community design which had effect before IP completion day in the United Kingdom and in respect of which an entry was recorded in the RCD register. (4) A notice under sub-paragraph (1) is of no effect unless the proprietor in that notice certifies that any such person— (a) has been given not less than three months' notice of the proprietor's intention to serve such a notice; or (b) is not affected by, or if affected consents to, the notice. (5) Where a notice has been served under sub-paragraph (1)— (a) the design ceases with effect from IP completion day to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act, (b) the obligation imposed on the registrar under paragraph 2 (entries to be made in the register in relation to designs treated as registered under this Act) ceases to have effect, and (c) the registrar must make any necessary amendments to the register. Effect of claim of priority 4 (1) This paragraph applies where a right of priority has been claimed in accordance with Article 42 in respect of an existing registered Community design. (2) The proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design is to be treated on and after IP completion day as having the same claim of priority. (3) Accordingly, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the re-registered design is new or has individual character is the date of filing of the application for registration of a design in a convention country which formed the basis for the claim of priority. Unregistered pre-exit transfers 5 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day there is a transfer of an existing registered Community design that has not been entered in the RCD register (a “relevant transfer”). (2) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant transfer as if it were an assignment of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design which has been transferred. Pre-exit licences to continue to have effect in the United Kingdom 6 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of a licence which— (a) authorises the doing of acts in the United Kingdom which would otherwise infringe an existing registered Community design, and (b) does not expire on IP completion day (a “relevant licence”). (2) Subject to any agreement to the contrary between the licensee and the licensor, a relevant licence continues to authorise the doing of acts which would otherwise infringe the right in the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (3) Sub-paragraph (2) is subject to the terms on which the relevant licence was granted, subject to such modifications as are necessary for their application in the United Kingdom. (4) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant licence as if it were a licence of the re-registered design deriving from the existing registered Community design which is subject to the relevant licence, subject to the following modification. (5) Where immediately before IP completion day there is an entry in the RCD register relating to the relevant licence, section 19(5) does not apply to the licence until after the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. Security interests in existing registered Community designs 7 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of an interest which has been granted as security and does not expire on IP completion day (a “relevant security interest”). (2) References to the existing registered Community design in any document which grants or refers to the relevant security interest are to be read as including references to the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (3) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant security interest as if it were a security interest granted in respect of the re-registered design deriving from the existing registered Community design which is subject to the relevant security interest, subject to the following modification. (4) Where immediately before IP completion day there is an entry in the RCD register relating to the relevant security interest, section 19(5) does not apply to the document granting the interest until after the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. Continuity of rights in relation to an existing registered Community design 8 (1) References to an existing registered Community design or the registration of an existing registered Community design in any document entered into before IP completion day shall, unless there is evidence that the document was not intended to have effect in the United Kingdom, be read on and after IP completion day as including references to the re-registered design or the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (2) Subject to any agreement to the contrary, a consent granted before IP completion day by the proprietor of an existing registered Community design to the doing on or after IP completion day of an act in the United Kingdom which would otherwise infringe the right in the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design is to be treated for the purposes of section 7A as a consent to the doing of that act granted by the registered proprietor of the re-registered design. Pending proceedings concerning an existing registered Community design 9 (1) This paragraph applies where on IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of proceedings which are pending (“pending proceedings”) before a court in the United Kingdom designated for the purposes of Article 80 (“a Community design court”). (2) Subject to sub-paragraphs (3) and (4), the provisions contained or referred to in Title IX of the Community Design Regulation (with the exception of Articles 86(2), (4), (5) and 91) shall continue to apply to the pending proceedings as if the United Kingdom were still a Member State with effect from IP completion day. (3) Where the pending proceedings involve a claim for infringement or for threatened infringement of an existing registered Community design, without prejudice to any other relief by way of damages, accounts or otherwise available to the proprietor of the existing registered Community design, the Community design court may grant an injunction to prohibit unauthorised use of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (4) Where the pending proceedings involve a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity in relation to an existing registered Community design, the Community design court may declare the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design to be invalid (wholly or in part). (5) Where the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid to any extent, the registration shall to that extent be treated as having been invalid from the date of registration or from such other date as the court may direct. (6) For the purposes of this paragraph proceedings are treated as pending on IP completion day if they were instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day. Existing registered Community design: effect of invalidity 9A. (1) This paragraph applies where, on IP completion day, an existing registered Community design is the subject of proceedings under Article 25 (Grounds for invalidity) which have been instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day (“invalidation proceedings”). (2) Subject to sub-paragraph (4) where— (a) the existing registered Community design is declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) pursuant to a decision which is finally determined, and (b) the registrar has either— (i) received notice of the situation referred to in paragraph (a) (“an invalidation notice”), or (ii) otherwise become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph (a), the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design must be declared invalid to the same extent as the existing registered Community design. (3) Where (by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)) the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid, the registrar must— (a) where there is a partial declaration of invalidity, amend the entry in the register of designs; (b) otherwise, remove the re-registered design from the register. (4) The registration of a re-registered design must not be declared invalid under sub-paragraph (2) where the grounds on which the existing registered Community design was declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) would not apply or would not have been satisfied in relation to the re-registered Community design if— (a) the re-registered design had been the subject of an entry on the register as at the date the invalidation proceedings were instituted, and (b) an application for a declaration of invalidity of the re-registered design based on those grounds had been made on that date under section 11ZA. (5) Where the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid to any extent pursuant to this paragraph— (a) it shall to that extent be treated as having been invalid from the date on which the rights of the proprietor of the existing registered Community design from which it derives are deemed to have ceased under the Community Design Regulation; (b) subject to any claim for compensation for damage caused by negligence or lack of good faith on the part of the proprietor or a claim for restitution based upon the unjust enrichment of the proprietor, the invalidity of the registration of the re-registered design does not affect— (i) a decision arising from infringement proceedings which has been finally determined and which has been enforced prior to the date of the declaration of invalidity made pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) (“the invalidity declaration date”); (ii) any contract entered into prior to the invalidity declaration date to the extent that it has been performed prior to that date, subject to the right of a party to the contract to claim the repayment of any consideration paid under the contract where, having regard to the circumstances, it is fair and equitable for such repayment to be made. (6) Where a declaration is made under sub-paragraph (2), section 11ZE(2) does not apply. (7) An invalidation notice may be sent by any person. (8) For the purposes of this paragraph— (a) proceedings are instituted if an application or counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity— (i) has been filed (and not subsequently withdrawn) with the European Union Intellectual Property Office or a court designated for the purposes of Article 80, and (ii) meets the requirements for being accorded a filing date under the Community Design Regulation and Commision Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002; (b) a decision is finally determined when— (i) it has been determined; and (ii) there is no further possibility of the determination being varied or set aside (disregarding any power to grant permission to appeal out of time). (9) An appeal lies from a declaration of invalidity under sub-paragraph (2). Effect of injunction protecting an existing registered Community design 10 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an injunction is in force prohibiting the performance of acts in the United Kingdom which infringe or would infringe an existing registered Community design (a “relevant injunction”). (2) Subject to any order of the court to the contrary, a relevant injunction will have effect and be enforceable to prohibit the performance of acts which infringe or would infringe the right in a re-registered design to the same extent as in relation to the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives as if it were an injunction granted by the court. PART 2 Applications for registered Community designs which are pending at IP completion day Applications for registration pending immediately before IP completion day 11 (1) In this Part references to an existing EU application are to an application for registration of a design under the Community Design Regulation in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that immediately before IP completion day— (a) the application has been accorded a filing date pursuant to Article 38; and (b) the application has been neither granted nor refused by the European Union Intellectual Property Office. 12 (1) Where a person who has filed an existing EU application or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the design which is the subject of the application under this Act is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the existing EU application. (2) In sub-paragraph (1), the “relevant period” means the period of nine months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. (3) For the purposes of this Act— (a) where an application is made of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of the application is the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application, and (b) where the registrar registers a design which is the subject of an application of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) which is made within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of registration of the design is the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application. (4) Accordingly section 3C does not apply in relation to the design. PART 3 Registered Community designs where publication is deferred at IP completion day Designs registered at the EUIPO immediately before IP completion day where publication is deferred 13 (1) In this Part references to a deferred design are to a design registered under the Community Design Regulation in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that immediately before IP completion day— (a) the design is entered in the RCD register, and (b) publication of the design is deferred under Article 50. 14 (1) This paragraph applies where the proprietor of a deferred design or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period. (2) Sections 3A(4) and 3B do not apply in relation to the application. (3) The relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the design which is the same as the deferred design is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the application for the deferred design; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the application for the deferred design. (4) If the registrar registers a design which is the subject of an application of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) which is made within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of registration of the design is the date on which the deferred design which is the same as that design was treated as registered under the Community Design Regulation. (5) Accordingly section 3C does not apply in relation to the design. (6) In sub-paragraph (1), the “relevant period” means, the period of nine months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. PART 4 Treatment of registered Community designs whose registrations expire during the period of six months ending on IP completion day Application of Part 15 (1) This Part applies to a design in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied (an “expired Community design”). (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that— (a) immediately before the transitional period, the design was the subject of a registration under the Community Design Regulation, (b) the registration of the design expired during the transitional period (such that the design did not fall within paragraph 1(1)), and (c) the registration of the design would have been capable of being renewed under Article 13 for at least one further period of five years had a request for renewal been made under Article 13 prior to that expiry. (3) An expired Community design is to be treated as if it were an existing registered Community design. (4) The provisions of Part 1 of this Schedule apply to an expired Community design as they apply to an existing Community design subject to the provisions of this Part of the Schedule. (5) Notwithstanding the entry in the register of designs (under paragraph 2, as applied by sub-paragraph (4)) of a re-registered design which derives from an expired Community design, the right in the re-registered design is expired until the period for which it subsists is extended in accordance with paragraph 16 (or the re-registered design is removed from the register in accordance with paragraph 16(3)). (6) In this paragraph, “transitional period” means the period of six months ending with IP completion day. Renewal of registration of an expired Community design 16 (1) Where the registration of an expired Community design is renewed in accordance with Article 13(3) of the Continuing Community Design Regulation the registrar must, as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of such renewal, record in the register of designs the extension of the period for which subsists the right in the re-registered design which derives from the expired Community design. (2) Where the period for which the right in a re-registered design subsists is extended under sub-paragraph (1), the right is to be treated as if it had never expired, with the result that— (a) anything done under or in relation to the right in the period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the extension under sub-paragraph (1) is to be treated as valid, (b) an act which would have constituted an infringement of the right if it had not expired is to be treated as an infringement, and (c) an act which would have constituted use of the design for the services of the Crown if the right had not expired is to be treated as such use. (3) If the registration of an expired Community design is not renewed within the time period permitted by Article 13(3) of the Continuing Community Design Regulation— (a) the registrar must remove from the register of designs the re-registered design which derives from the expired Community design; and (b) the re-registered design ceases with effect from IP completion day to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act. (4) In this Schedule “the Continuing Community Design Regulation” means the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December 2001 on Community Designs as it has effect in EU law. PART 5 Restoration of registered Community design registrations and applications Restoration of registered Community design to the RCD register 17 (1) This paragraph applies where: (a) before IP completion day a registered Community design is removed from the RCD register pursuant to the Community Design Regulation, and (b) on or after IP completion day the registration of the said design is restored pursuant to Article 67 of the Continuing Community Design Regulation. (2) Where the proprietor of the design files a request with the registrar within the period of six months beginning with the date of such restoration— (a) the design will be treated as if it were an existing registered Community design on IP completion day; (b) the provisions of Part 1 apply to the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. Restoration of application for registered Community design 18 (1) This paragraph applies where— (a) before IP completion day an application for a registered Community design is refused pursuant to the Community Design Regulation; and (b) on or after IP completion day the application is restored pursuant to Article 67 of the Continuing Community Design Regulation (a “relevant application”). (2) Where a person who has filed a relevant application or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether the design which is the subject of the application under this Act is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the relevant application; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the relevant application. (3) In sub-paragraph (2), the “relevant period” means the period of nine months beginning with the day on which the application is restored as referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(b). PART 6 Interpretation Interpretation 19 In this Schedule— “the Community Design Regulation” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(7); “the Continuing Community Design Regulation” has the meaning given by paragraph 16(4); “existing registered Community design” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(1); “expired Community design” has the meaning given by paragraph 15(1); “RCD register” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(7); “re-registered design” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(2). 20 References in this Schedule to an “Article” are to an Article of the Community Design Regulation.

Your change, as a redline

SCHEDULE 1A EUROPEAN COMMUNITY REGISTERED DESIGNS

Section 12A PART 1 Existing registered Community designs Designs registered as Community designs to be treated as registered under the Act 1 (1) A design which, immediately before IP completion day, is entered in the RCD register and has been published in the Community Designs Bulletin as mentioned in Article 73(1) (an “existing registered Community design”) is to be treated on and after IP completion day as if an application for its registration had been made, and it had been registered, under this Act. (2) A registered design which comes into being by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is referred to in this Schedule as a “re-registered design”. (3) This Act applies to a re-registered design as it applies to other registered designs except as otherwise provided in this Schedule. (4) For the purposes of this Act— (a) the date of registration of a re-registered design is the date on which the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives was treated as registered under the Community Design Regulation, and (b) the date of the application of a re-registered design is the date treated, under Article 38, as the date of filing of the application for the registration of the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives. (5) Nothing in this Act authorises the imposition of a fee, or the making of provision by rules or regulations which authorises the imposition of a fee, in respect of any matter relating to a re-registered design (see instead provision made by regulations under Schedule 4 to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018). (6) The following provisions of this Act do not apply to a re-registered design— (a) section 7A(6); (b) section 18. (7) In this Schedule— (a) “the RCD register” means the register of registered Community designs maintained under Article 72; (b) “the Community Design Regulation” means Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December 2001 on Community Designs as it had effect immediately before IP completion day. Entries to be made in the register in relation to designs treated as registered under this Act 2 (1) The registrar must as soon as reasonably practicable on or after IP completion day enter a re-registered design in the register of designs. (2) The obligation under section 22(1) (inspection of registered designs) applies to a re-registered design on and after the day on which the re-registered design is entered in the register (notwithstanding that no certificate of registration has been granted). Opt out 3 (1) Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the proprietor of an existing registered Community design may at any time on or after IP completion day serve a notice on the registrar that the design is not to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act. (2) A notice under sub-paragraph (1) may not be served where on or after IP completion day— (a) the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design (or any interest in it)— (i) has been assigned or otherwise transferred except by an assent by personal representatives, or (ii) has had an interest created in it by a mortgage, licence or other instrument; or (b) proceedings based on the re-registered design have been initiated by the proprietor or with the proprietor's consent. (3) A notice served under sub-paragraph (1) must— (a) identify the existing registered Community design; and (b) include the name and address of any person having an interest in the existing registered Community design which had effect before IP completion day in the United Kingdom and in respect of which an entry was recorded in the RCD register. (4) A notice under sub-paragraph (1) is of no effect unless the proprietor in that notice certifies that any such person— (a) has been given not less than three months' notice of the proprietor's intention to serve such a notice; or (b) is not affected by, or if affected consents to, the notice. (5) Where a notice has been served under sub-paragraph (1)— (a) the design ceases with effect from IP completion day to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act, (b) the obligation imposed on the registrar under paragraph 2 (entries to be made in the register in relation to designs treated as registered under this Act) ceases to have effect, and (c) the registrar must make any necessary amendments to the register. Effect of claim of priority 4 (1) This paragraph applies where a right of priority has been claimed in accordance with Article 42 in respect of an existing registered Community design. (2) The proprietor of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design is to be treated on and after IP completion day as having the same claim of priority. (3) Accordingly, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the re-registered design is new or has individual character is the date of filing of the application for registration of a design in a convention country which formed the basis for the claim of priority. Unregistered pre-exit transfers 5 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day there is a transfer of an existing registered Community design that has not been entered in the RCD register (a “relevant transfer”). (2) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant transfer as if it were an assignment of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design which has been transferred. Pre-exit licences to continue to have effect in the United Kingdom 6 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of a licence which— (a) authorises the doing of acts in the United Kingdom which would otherwise infringe an existing registered Community design, and (b) does not expire on IP completion day (a “relevant licence”). (2) Subject to any agreement to the contrary between the licensee and the licensor, a relevant licence continues to authorise the doing of acts which would otherwise infringe the right in the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (3) Sub-paragraph (2) is subject to the terms on which the relevant licence was granted, subject to such modifications as are necessary for their application in the United Kingdom. (4) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant licence as if it were a licence of the re-registered design deriving from the existing registered Community design which is subject to the relevant licence, subject to the following modification. (5) Where immediately before IP completion day there is an entry in the RCD register relating to the relevant licence, section 19(5) does not apply to the licence until after the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. Security interests in existing registered Community designs 7 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of an interest which has been granted as security and does not expire on IP completion day (a “relevant security interest”). (2) References to the existing registered Community design in any document which grants or refers to the relevant security interest are to be read as including references to the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (3) Section 19 (registration of assignments, etc.) applies in relation to a relevant security interest as if it were a security interest granted in respect of the re-registered design deriving from the existing registered Community design which is subject to the relevant security interest, subject to the following modification. (4) Where immediately before IP completion day there is an entry in the RCD register relating to the relevant security interest, section 19(5) does not apply to the document granting the interest until after the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. Continuity of rights in relation to an existing registered Community design 8 (1) References to an existing registered Community design or the registration of an existing registered Community design in any document entered into before IP completion day shall, unless there is evidence that the document was not intended to have effect in the United Kingdom, be read on and after IP completion day as including references to the re-registered design or the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (2) Subject to any agreement to the contrary, a consent granted before IP completion day by the proprietor of an existing registered Community design to the doing on or after IP completion day of an act in the United Kingdom which would otherwise infringe the right in the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design is to be treated for the purposes of section 7A as a consent to the doing of that act granted by the registered proprietor of the re-registered design. Pending proceedings concerning an existing registered Community design 9 (1) This paragraph applies where on IP completion day an existing registered Community design is the subject of proceedings which are pending (“pending proceedings”) before a court in the United Kingdom designated for the purposes of Article 80 (“a Community design court”). (2) Subject to sub-paragraphs (3) and (4), the provisions contained or referred to in Title IX of the Community Design Regulation (with the exception of Articles 86(2), (4), (5) and 91) shall continue to apply to the pending proceedings as if the United Kingdom were still a Member State with effect from IP completion day. (3) Where the pending proceedings involve a claim for infringement or for threatened infringement of an existing registered Community design, without prejudice to any other relief by way of damages, accounts or otherwise available to the proprietor of the existing registered Community design, the Community design court may grant an injunction to prohibit unauthorised use of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. (4) Where the pending proceedings involve a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity in relation to an existing registered Community design, the Community design court may declare the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design to be invalid (wholly or in part). (5) Where the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid to any extent, the registration shall to that extent be treated as having been invalid from the date of registration or from such other date as the court may direct. (6) For the purposes of this paragraph proceedings are treated as pending on IP completion day if they were instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day. Existing registered Community design: effect of invalidity 9A. (1) This paragraph applies where, on IP completion day, an existing registered Community design is the subject of proceedings under Article 25 (Grounds for invalidity) which have been instituted but not finally determined before IP completion day (“invalidation proceedings”). (2) Subject to sub-paragraph (4) where— (a) the existing registered Community design is declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) pursuant to a decision which is finally determined, and (b) the registrar has either— (i) received notice of the situation referred to in paragraph (a) (“an invalidation notice”), or (ii) otherwise become aware of the situation referred to in paragraph (a), the registration of the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design must be declared invalid to the same extent as the existing registered Community design. (3) Where (by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)) the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid, the registrar must— (a) where there is a partial declaration of invalidity, amend the entry in the register of designs; (b) otherwise, remove the re-registered design from the register. (4) The registration of a re-registered design must not be declared invalid under sub-paragraph (2) where the grounds on which the existing registered Community design was declared invalid (whether wholly or partly) would not apply or would not have been satisfied in relation to the re-registered Community design if— (a) the re-registered design had been the subject of an entry on the register as at the date the invalidation proceedings were instituted, and (b) an application for a declaration of invalidity of the re-registered design based on those grounds had been made on that date under section 11ZA. (5) Where the registration of a re-registered design is declared invalid to any extent pursuant to this paragraph— (a) it shall to that extent be treated as having been invalid from the date on which the rights of the proprietor of the existing registered Community design from which it derives are deemed to have ceased under the Community Design Regulation; (b) subject to any claim for compensation for damage caused by negligence or lack of good faith on the part of the proprietor or a claim for restitution based upon the unjust enrichment of the proprietor, the invalidity of the registration of the re-registered design does not affect— (i) a decision arising from infringement proceedings which has been finally determined and which has been enforced prior to the date of the declaration of invalidity made pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) (“the invalidity declaration date”); (ii) any contract entered into prior to the invalidity declaration date to the extent that it has been performed prior to that date, subject to the right of a party to the contract to claim the repayment of any consideration paid under the contract where, having regard to the circumstances, it is fair and equitable for such repayment to be made. (6) Where a declaration is made under sub-paragraph (2), section 11ZE(2) does not apply. (7) An invalidation notice may be sent by any person. (8) For the purposes of this paragraph— (a) proceedings are instituted if an application or counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity— (i) has been filed (and not subsequently withdrawn) with the European Union Intellectual Property Office or a court designated for the purposes of Article 80, and (ii) meets the requirements for being accorded a filing date under the Community Design Regulation and Commision Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002; (b) a decision is finally determined when— (i) it has been determined; and (ii) there is no further possibility of the determination being varied or set aside (disregarding any power to grant permission to appeal out of time). (9) An appeal lies from a declaration of invalidity under sub-paragraph (2). Effect of injunction protecting an existing registered Community design 10 (1) This paragraph applies where immediately before IP completion day an injunction is in force prohibiting the performance of acts in the United Kingdom which infringe or would infringe an existing registered Community design (a “relevant injunction”). (2) Subject to any order of the court to the contrary, a relevant injunction will have effect and be enforceable to prohibit the performance of acts which infringe or would infringe the right in a re-registered design to the same extent as in relation to the existing registered Community design from which the re-registered design derives as if it were an injunction granted by the court. PART 2 Applications for registered Community designs which are pending at IP completion day Applications for registration pending immediately before IP completion day 11 (1) In this Part references to an existing EU application are to an application for registration of a design under the Community Design Regulation in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that immediately before IP completion day— (a) the application has been accorded a filing date pursuant to Article 38; and (b) the application has been neither granted nor refused by the European Union Intellectual Property Office. 12 (1) Where a person who has filed an existing EU application or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the design which is the subject of the application under this Act is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the existing EU application. (2) In sub-paragraph (1), the “relevant period” means the period of nine months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. (3) For the purposes of this Act— (a) where an application is made of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of the application is the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application, and (b) where the registrar registers a design which is the subject of an application of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) which is made within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of registration of the design is the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the existing EU application. (4) Accordingly section 3C does not apply in relation to the design. PART 3 Registered Community designs where publication is deferred at IP completion day Designs registered at the EUIPO immediately before IP completion day where publication is deferred 13 (1) In this Part references to a deferred design are to a design registered under the Community Design Regulation in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied. (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that immediately before IP completion day— (a) the design is entered in the RCD register, and (b) publication of the design is deferred under Article 50. 14 (1) This paragraph applies where the proprietor of a deferred design or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period. (2) Sections 3A(4) and 3B do not apply in relation to the application. (3) The relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether (or to what extent) the design which is the same as the deferred design is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the application for the deferred design; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the application for the deferred design. (4) If the registrar registers a design which is the subject of an application of the type referred to in sub-paragraph (1) which is made within the period referred to in that sub-paragraph, the date of registration of the design is the date on which the deferred design which is the same as that design was treated as registered under the Community Design Regulation. (5) Accordingly section 3C does not apply in relation to the design. (6) In sub-paragraph (1), the “relevant period” means, the period of nine months beginning with the day after that on which IP completion day falls. PART 4 Treatment of registered Community designs whose registrations expire during the period of six months ending on IP completion day Application of Part 15 (1) This Part applies to a design in respect of which the conditions in sub-paragraph (2) are satisfied (an “expired Community design”). (2) The conditions referred to in sub-paragraph (1) are that— (a) immediately before the transitional period, the design was the subject of a registration under the Community Design Regulation, (b) the registration of the design expired during the transitional period (such that the design did not fall within paragraph 1(1)), and (c) the registration of the design would have been capable of being renewed under Article 13 for at least one further period of five years had a request for renewal been made under Article 13 prior to that expiry. (3) An expired Community design is to be treated as if it were an existing registered Community design. (4) The provisions of Part 1 of this Schedule apply to an expired Community design as they apply to an existing Community design subject to the provisions of this Part of the Schedule. (5) Notwithstanding the entry in the register of designs (under paragraph 2, as applied by sub-paragraph (4)) of a re-registered design which derives from an expired Community design, the right in the re-registered design is expired until the period for which it subsists is extended in accordance with paragraph 16 (or the re-registered design is removed from the register in accordance with paragraph 16(3)). (6) In this paragraph, “transitional period” means the period of six months ending with IP completion day. Renewal of registration of an expired Community design 16 (1) Where the registration of an expired Community design is renewed in accordance with Article 13(3) of the Continuing Community Design Regulation the registrar must, as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of such renewal, record in the register of designs the extension of the period for which subsists the right in the re-registered design which derives from the expired Community design. (2) Where the period for which the right in a re-registered design subsists is extended under sub-paragraph (1), the right is to be treated as if it had never expired, with the result that— (a) anything done under or in relation to the right in the period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the extension under sub-paragraph (1) is to be treated as valid, (b) an act which would have constituted an infringement of the right if it had not expired is to be treated as an infringement, and (c) an act which would have constituted use of the design for the services of the Crown if the right had not expired is to be treated as such use. (3) If the registration of an expired Community design is not renewed within the time period permitted by Article 13(3) of the Continuing Community Design Regulation— (a) the registrar must remove from the register of designs the re-registered design which derives from the expired Community design; and (b) the re-registered design ceases with effect from IP completion day to be treated as if it had been registered under this Act. (4) In this Schedule “the Continuing Community Design Regulation” means the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December 2001 on Community Designs as it has effect in EU law. PART 5 Restoration of registered Community design registrations and applications Restoration of registered Community design to the RCD register 17 (1) This paragraph applies where: (a) before IP completion day a registered Community design is removed from the RCD register pursuant to the Community Design Regulation, and (b) on or after IP completion day the registration of the said design is restored pursuant to Article 67 of the Continuing Community Design Regulation. (2) Where the proprietor of the design files a request with the registrar within the period of six months beginning with the date of such restoration— (a) the design will be treated as if it were an existing registered Community design on IP completion day; (b) the provisions of Part 1 apply to the re-registered design which derives from the existing registered Community design. Restoration of application for registered Community design 18 (1) This paragraph applies where— (a) before IP completion day an application for a registered Community design is refused pursuant to the Community Design Regulation; and (b) on or after IP completion day the application is restored pursuant to Article 67 of the Continuing Community Design Regulation (a “relevant application”). (2) Where a person who has filed a relevant application or a successor in title of that person applies for registration of the same design under this Act within a period beginning with IP completion day and ending with the end of the relevant period, the relevant date for the purposes of establishing whether the design which is the subject of the application under this Act is new or has individual character is the earliest of— (a) the filing date accorded pursuant to Article 38 to the relevant application; (b) the date of priority (if any) claimed under Article 42 in respect of the relevant application. (3) In sub-paragraph (2), the “relevant period” means the period of nine months beginning with the day on which the application is restored as referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(b). PART 6 Interpretation Interpretation 19 In this Schedule— “the Community Design Regulation” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(7); “the Continuing Community Design Regulation” has the meaning given by paragraph 16(4); “existing registered Community design” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(1); “expired Community design” has the meaning given by paragraph 15(1); “RCD register” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(7); “re-registered design” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(2). 20 References in this Schedule to an “Article” are to an Article of the Community Design Regulation.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds