Propose a change

Greater London Authority Act 1999

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

233 Provision of information to the PPP arbiter.

(1) Any person falling within subsection (2) below shall, at the request of the PPP arbiter, provide him with such information as the PPP arbiter considers relevant to the proper discharge of the functions conferred or imposed on him by or under this Act and as may be specified or described in the request. (2) The persons who fall within this subsection are— (a) any party to a PPP agreement; (b) any associate of a party to a PPP agreement; and (c) any PPP related third party. (3) The information shall be provided in such form and manner, and within such time, as may be specified in the request. (4) A person is not obliged by virtue of this section to answer any question or produce any document which he would be entitled to refuse to answer or produce in or for the purposes of proceedings in a court in England and Wales. (5) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, associate, in relation to a party to a PPP agreement, means— (a) a parent undertaking of that party; (b) a subsidiary undertaking of any parent undertaking of that party; (c) a subsidiary undertaking of that party; or (d) an undertaking in which that party, or any undertaking falling within paragraphs (a) to (c) above, has a participating interest. (6) For the purposes of subsection (5) above— parent undertaking and subsidiary undertaking shall be construed in accordance with section 1162 of the Companies Act 2006 ; undertaking has the meaning given by section 1161(1) of that Act; and participating interest has the meaning given by section 421A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 .

Your change, as a redline

233 Provision of information to the PPP arbiter.

(1) Any person falling within subsection (2) below shall, at the request of the PPP arbiter, provide him with such information as the PPP arbiter considers relevant to the proper discharge of the functions conferred or imposed on him by or under this Act and as may be specified or described in the request. (2) The persons who fall within this subsection are— (a) any party to a PPP agreement; (b) any associate of a party to a PPP agreement; and (c) any PPP related third party. (3) The information shall be provided in such form and manner, and within such time, as may be specified in the request. (4) A person is not obliged by virtue of this section to answer any question or produce any document which he would be entitled to refuse to answer or produce in or for the purposes of proceedings in a court in England and Wales. (5) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, associate, in relation to a party to a PPP agreement, means— (a) a parent undertaking of that party; (b) a subsidiary undertaking of any parent undertaking of that party; (c) a subsidiary undertaking of that party; or (d) an undertaking in which that party, or any undertaking falling within paragraphs (a) to (c) above, has a participating interest. (6) For the purposes of subsection (5) above— parent undertaking and subsidiary undertaking shall be construed in accordance with section 1162 of the Companies Act 2006 ; undertaking has the meaning given by section 1161(1) of that Act; and participating interest has the meaning given by section 421A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds