Propose a change

Greater London Authority Act 1999

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

252C Action on investigation under section 252B

(1) On investigating a matter under section 252B the Committee must, if it considers it appropriate to do so— (a) in every case, make appropriate representations to the person providing the service; (b) in the case of a service provided under a franchise agreement by a person other than the franchisee, make appropriate representations to the franchisee; and (c) in the case of a secured service (within the meaning of Part 4 of the Railways Act 2005), make appropriate representations to the Secretary of State. (2) In subsection (1) “appropriate representations” means representations about— (a) any matter appearing to the Committee to be relevant to the subject-matter of the investigation; and (b) any other matter to which a matter so appearing relates. (3) Subject to subsection (4), where the Committee— (a) having made representations under subsection (1), is of the opinion that it is unable to obtain a satisfactory resolution by that means, (b) on investigating a matter, has reason for believing that the holder of a licence under Part 1 of the Railways Act 1993 is contravening a condition of the licence, or is likely to do so, or (c) on investigating a matter, has reason for believing that a franchisee in relation to a franchise agreement is contravening the provisions of the agreement, or is likely to do so, the Committee must refer the matter to the Secretary of State (or if he referred it to the Committee, back to him) with a view to his exercising such of his powers as he considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply in a case where representations under subsection (2) have been made to the Secretary of State. (5) If the Secretary of State considers that it would be more appropriate for a matter referred to him by the Committee under subsection (3) to be referred to the Office of Rail and Road, he must— (a) refer it to that Office, or (b) if it was referred to the Committee by that Office, refer it back to that Office, with a view to that Office exercising such of its powers as it considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. (6) The Committee must not— (a) include a proposal for the taking of any steps in representations made by it under this section, or (b) make a reference under this section to the Secretary of State by reason only of the failure of a person to take any steps, unless the test in subsection (7) is satisfied. (7) That test is satisfied if, on the basis of the information available to the Committee, it considers that, balancing each of the following against the other— (a) the costs of taking the steps, and (b) the benefits that will be enjoyed by persons in consequence of the taking of those steps, the expenditure involved represents good value for money. (8) In this section “franchise agreement” and “franchisee” have the same meanings as in Part 1 of the Railways Act 1993.

Your change, as a redline

252C Action on investigation under section 252B

(1) On investigating a matter under section 252B the Committee must, if it considers it appropriate to do so— (a) in every case, make appropriate representations to the person providing the service; (b) in the case of a service provided under a franchise agreement by a person other than the franchisee, make appropriate representations to the franchisee; and (c) in the case of a secured service (within the meaning of Part 4 of the Railways Act 2005), make appropriate representations to the Secretary of State. (2) In subsection (1) “appropriate representations” means representations about— (a) any matter appearing to the Committee to be relevant to the subject-matter of the investigation; and (b) any other matter to which a matter so appearing relates. (3) Subject to subsection (4), where the Committee— (a) having made representations under subsection (1), is of the opinion that it is unable to obtain a satisfactory resolution by that means, (b) on investigating a matter, has reason for believing that the holder of a licence under Part 1 of the Railways Act 1993 is contravening a condition of the licence, or is likely to do so, or (c) on investigating a matter, has reason for believing that a franchisee in relation to a franchise agreement is contravening the provisions of the agreement, or is likely to do so, the Committee must refer the matter to the Secretary of State (or if he referred it to the Committee, back to him) with a view to his exercising such of his powers as he considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply in a case where representations under subsection (2) have been made to the Secretary of State. (5) If the Secretary of State considers that it would be more appropriate for a matter referred to him by the Committee under subsection (3) to be referred to the Office of Rail and Road, he must— (a) refer it to that Office, or (b) if it was referred to the Committee by that Office, refer it back to that Office, with a view to that Office exercising such of its powers as it considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. (6) The Committee must not— (a) include a proposal for the taking of any steps in representations made by it under this section, or (b) make a reference under this section to the Secretary of State by reason only of the failure of a person to take any steps, unless the test in subsection (7) is satisfied. (7) That test is satisfied if, on the basis of the information available to the Committee, it considers that, balancing each of the following against the other— (a) the costs of taking the steps, and (b) the benefits that will be enjoyed by persons in consequence of the taking of those steps, the expenditure involved represents good value for money. (8) In this section “franchise agreement” and “franchisee” have the same meanings as in Part 1 of the Railways Act 1993.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds