The Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
119 Refund of employer additional contribution for ill health award following review
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), where the scheme manager has considered the entitlement of a member (P) to an ill-health award under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension) and as a consequence of that review the entitlement of P to either a higher tier ill-health pension or a lower tier ill-health pension has ceased, or the entitlement of P to both pensions has ceased, the scheme manager must pay the amount in paragraph (3) or (5), as the case may be, to the employer.
(2) Where the employer has paid all the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contributions required by regulation 118 (employer additional contribution: ill-health award), the scheme manager is not required to pay the employer the amount mentioned in paragraph (3).
(3) Where P, as a result of a review under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension), ceases to be entitled to a higher tier ill-health pension and remains entitled to a lower tier ill-health pension, the scheme manager must pay an amount equal to the difference between the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution which have been paid under regulation 118(1) (employer additional contribution: ill-health award) and the instalments of the lower tier ill-health additional contribution which would have been required to be paid under regulation 118(3) (employer additional contribution: ill-health award) if only the lower tier ill-health pension had been payable (“the notional payment”).
(4) The scheme manager must determine the amount of the notional payment payable under paragraph (3).
(5) Where P, as a result of a review under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension), ceases to be entitled to a higher tier ill health pension and to a lower tier ill-health pension or to a lower tier ill-health pension as the case may be and the employer has not paid all the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution or lower tier ill-health additional contribution as required by regulation 118 (employer additional contribution ill-health award), the scheme manager must repay to the employer any instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution or lower tier ill-health additional contribution as the case may be, which have been paid in respect of P from the date that the entitlement ceased and no further instalments will be due in respect of P.
Your change, as a redline
119 Refund of employer additional contribution for ill health award following review
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), where the scheme manager has considered the entitlement of a member (P) to an ill-health award under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension) and as a consequence of that review the entitlement of P to either a higher tier ill-health pension or a lower tier ill-health pension has ceased, or the entitlement of P to both pensions has ceased, the scheme manager must pay the amount in paragraph (3) or (5), as the case may be, to the employer.
(2) Where the employer has paid all the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contributions required by regulation 118 (employer additional contribution: ill-health award), the scheme manager is not required to pay the employer the amount mentioned in paragraph (3).
(3) Where P, as a result of a review under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension), ceases to be entitled to a higher tier ill-health pension and remains entitled to a lower tier ill-health pension, the scheme manager must pay an amount equal to the difference between the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution which have been paid under regulation 118(1) (employer additional contribution: ill-health award) and the instalments of the lower tier ill-health additional contribution which would have been required to be paid under regulation 118(3) (employer additional contribution: ill-health award) if only the lower tier ill-health pension had been payable (“the notional payment”).
(4) The scheme manager must determine the amount of the notional payment payable under paragraph (3).
(5) Where P, as a result of a review under regulation 68 (review of ill-health award or early payment of retirement pension), ceases to be entitled to a higher tier ill health pension and to a lower tier ill-health pension or to a lower tier ill-health pension as the case may be and the employer has not paid all the instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution or lower tier ill-health additional contribution as required by regulation 118 (employer additional contribution ill-health award), the scheme manager must repay to the employer any instalments of higher tier ill-health additional contribution or lower tier ill-health additional contribution as the case may be, which have been paid in respect of P from the date that the entitlement ceased and no further instalments will be due in respect of P.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.