The Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
154 Appeals against determinations based on medical evidence
(1) A member (P) who wishes to appeal against a scheme manager’s determination on an issue of a medical nature may do so to a board of medical referees in accordance with the provisions of regulations 155 (notice of appeal) to 162 (notices etc).
(2) Subject to paragraph (3), where a determination—
(a) is made with regard to an opinion obtained under regulation 152(2) (role of IQMP in determinations by the scheme manager) or medical evidence relied on as mentioned in regulation 152(7); or
(b) is reconsidered under regulation 153(4) (review of medical opinion) with regard to a response under paragraph (2) of that regulation,
the scheme manager must, within 14 days of making, confirming or revising the determination (as the case may be), send to P the documents mentioned in paragraph (4).
(3) Nothing in paragraph (2) requires the supply of documents that have already been supplied under regulation 152(8) (role of IQMP in determinations by the scheme manager) or 153(5) (review of medical opinion).
(4) The documents are—
(a) a copy of the opinion, response or evidence (as the case may be);
(b) an explanation of the procedure for appeals under this regulation; and
(c) a statement that, if P wishes to appeal against the scheme manager’s determination on an issue of a medical nature, P must give written notice to the scheme manager, stating P’s name and address and the grounds of appeal, not later than 28 days after P receives the last of the documents required to be supplied under this paragraph, or within such longer period as the scheme manager may allow.
Your change, as a redline
154 Appeals against determinations based on medical evidence
(1) A member (P) who wishes to appeal against a scheme manager’s determination on an issue of a medical nature may do so to a board of medical referees in accordance with the provisions of regulations 155 (notice of appeal) to 162 (notices etc).
(2) Subject to paragraph (3), where a determination—
(a) is made with regard to an opinion obtained under regulation 152(2) (role of IQMP in determinations by the scheme manager) or medical evidence relied on as mentioned in regulation 152(7); or
(b) is reconsidered under regulation 153(4) (review of medical opinion) with regard to a response under paragraph (2) of that regulation,
the scheme manager must, within 14 days of making, confirming or revising the determination (as the case may be), send to P the documents mentioned in paragraph (4).
(3) Nothing in paragraph (2) requires the supply of documents that have already been supplied under regulation 152(8) (role of IQMP in determinations by the scheme manager) or 153(5) (review of medical opinion).
(4) The documents are—
(a) a copy of the opinion, response or evidence (as the case may be);
(b) an explanation of the procedure for appeals under this regulation; and
(c) a statement that, if P wishes to appeal against the scheme manager’s determination on an issue of a medical nature, P must give written notice to the scheme manager, stating P’s name and address and the grounds of appeal, not later than 28 days after P receives the last of the documents required to be supplied under this paragraph, or within such longer period as the scheme manager may allow.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.