The Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
156 Reference of appeal to the board
(1) On receiving a notice of appeal, the scheme manager must supply the Secretary of State with three copies of—
(a) the notice of appeal;
(b) the notice of the relevant determination;
(c) the opinion, response or evidence (as the case may be) supplied to the appellant (P); and
(d) every other document in its possession or under its control which appears to it to be relevant to the issue that is the subject of the appeal.
(2) The Secretary of State must refer an appeal to a board of medical referees (“the board”).
(3) The board is to consist of not less than three medical practitioners appointed by, or in accordance with arrangements made by, the Secretary of State.
(4) One member of the board must be a specialist in a medical condition relevant to the appeal.
(5) One member of the board must be appointed as chairman.
(6) Where there is an equality of votes among the members of the board, the chairman is to have a second or casting vote.
(7) As soon as reasonably practicable after referring an appeal to the board, the Secretary of State must supply the board’s administrator with three copies of every document supplied under paragraph (1).
(8) The board must arrange for one of their number to review those documents (‘the reviewing member’).
(9) As soon as reasonably practicable after concluding the review, the reviewing member must give written notice to the Secretary of State—
(a) of any other information which the reviewing member considers would be desirable so as to provide the board with sufficient information for the purpose of enabling the board to determine the appeal; and
(b) if it is the case, that it is the reviewing member’s opinion that the board may regard the appeal as frivolous, vexatious or manifestly ill-founded.
(10) On receipt of the reviewing member’s notice the Secretary of State must—
(a) where the reviewing member has notified the Secretary of State of the desirability of obtaining other information, require the scheme manager to use its best endeavours to obtain that information; and
(b) where the notice contains an opinion of the description mentioned in paragraph (9)(b), send a copy of it to the scheme manager.
(11) A scheme manager which receives a copy of a reviewing member’s opinion must, as soon as reasonably practicable—
(a) send a copy of it to P; and
(b) by written notice to P—
(i) advise P that, if P’s appeal is unsuccessful, P may be required to pay the scheme manager’s costs, and
(ii) require P to notify it within 14 days of the date of the notice, whether P intends to pursue or withdraw the appeal.
(12) A scheme manager which notifies P under paragraph (11)(b) must inform the Secretary of State of P’s response to its request under sub-paragraph (b)(ii); and the Secretary of State must notify the board accordingly.
Your change, as a redline
156 Reference of appeal to the board
(1) On receiving a notice of appeal, the scheme manager must supply the Secretary of State with three copies of—
(a) the notice of appeal;
(b) the notice of the relevant determination;
(c) the opinion, response or evidence (as the case may be) supplied to the appellant (P); and
(d) every other document in its possession or under its control which appears to it to be relevant to the issue that is the subject of the appeal.
(2) The Secretary of State must refer an appeal to a board of medical referees (“the board”).
(3) The board is to consist of not less than three medical practitioners appointed by, or in accordance with arrangements made by, the Secretary of State.
(4) One member of the board must be a specialist in a medical condition relevant to the appeal.
(5) One member of the board must be appointed as chairman.
(6) Where there is an equality of votes among the members of the board, the chairman is to have a second or casting vote.
(7) As soon as reasonably practicable after referring an appeal to the board, the Secretary of State must supply the board’s administrator with three copies of every document supplied under paragraph (1).
(8) The board must arrange for one of their number to review those documents (‘the reviewing member’).
(9) As soon as reasonably practicable after concluding the review, the reviewing member must give written notice to the Secretary of State—
(a) of any other information which the reviewing member considers would be desirable so as to provide the board with sufficient information for the purpose of enabling the board to determine the appeal; and
(b) if it is the case, that it is the reviewing member’s opinion that the board may regard the appeal as frivolous, vexatious or manifestly ill-founded.
(10) On receipt of the reviewing member’s notice the Secretary of State must—
(a) where the reviewing member has notified the Secretary of State of the desirability of obtaining other information, require the scheme manager to use its best endeavours to obtain that information; and
(b) where the notice contains an opinion of the description mentioned in paragraph (9)(b), send a copy of it to the scheme manager.
(11) A scheme manager which receives a copy of a reviewing member’s opinion must, as soon as reasonably practicable—
(a) send a copy of it to P; and
(b) by written notice to P—
(i) advise P that, if P’s appeal is unsuccessful, P may be required to pay the scheme manager’s costs, and
(ii) require P to notify it within 14 days of the date of the notice, whether P intends to pursue or withdraw the appeal.
(12) A scheme manager which notifies P under paragraph (11)(b) must inform the Secretary of State of P’s response to its request under sub-paragraph (b)(ii); and the Secretary of State must notify the board accordingly.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.