Energy Act 2016
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
59 Procedure for enforcement decisions
(1) The OGA must determine the procedure that it proposes to follow in relation to enforcement decisions. (2) That procedure must be designed to secure, among other things, that an enforcement decision is taken— (a) by a person falling within subsection (3), or (b) by two or more persons, each of whom falls within subsection (3). (3) A person falls within this subsection if the person was not directly involved in establishing the evidence on which the enforcement decision is based. (4) The OGA must issue a statement of its proposals. (5) The statement must be published in a way appearing to the OGA to be best calculated to bring the statement to the attention of the public. (6) When the OGA takes an enforcement decision, the OGA must follow its stated procedure. (7) If the OGA changes its procedure in a material way, it must publish a revised statement. (8) A failure of the OGA in a particular case to follow its procedure as set out in the latest published statement does not affect the validity of an enforcement decision taken in that case. (9) But subsection (8) does not prevent the Tribunal from taking into account any such failure in considering an appeal under section 51 or 52 in relation to a sanction notice. (10) In this section “enforcement decision” means either of the following— (a) a decision to give a sanction notice in respect of a failure to comply with a petroleum-related requirement; (b) a decision as to the details of the sanction to be imposed by the notice.
59 Procedure for enforcement decisions
(1) The OGA must determine the procedure that it proposes to follow in relation to enforcement decisions. (2) That procedure must be designed to secure, among other things, that an enforcement decision is taken— (a) by a person falling within subsection (3), or (b) by two or more persons, each of whom falls within subsection (3). (3) A person falls within this subsection if the person was not directly involved in establishing the evidence on which the enforcement decision is based. (4) The OGA must issue a statement of its proposals. (5) The statement must be published in a way appearing to the OGA to be best calculated to bring the statement to the attention of the public. (6) When the OGA takes an enforcement decision, the OGA must follow its stated procedure. (7) If the OGA changes its procedure in a material way, it must publish a revised statement. (8) A failure of the OGA in a particular case to follow its procedure as set out in the latest published statement does not affect the validity of an enforcement decision taken in that case. (9) But subsection (8) does not prevent the Tribunal from taking into account any such failure in considering an appeal under section 51 or 52 in relation to a sanction notice. (10) In this section “enforcement decision” means either of the following— (a) a decision to give a sanction notice in respect of a failure to comply with a petroleum-related requirement; (b) a decision as to the details of the sanction to be imposed by the notice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.