Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

203A Employment-related benefit provided under optional remuneration arrangements

(1) Where an employment-related benefit is provided pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for the tax year in which the benefit is provided, and (b) section 203(1) does not apply. (2) To find the relevant amount, first determine which (if any) is the greater of— (a) the cost of the employment-related benefit, and (b) the amount foregone with respect to the benefit (see section 69B). (3) If the cost of the employment-related benefit is greater than or equal to the amount foregone, the “relevant amount” is the cash equivalent (see section 203(2)). (4) Otherwise, the “relevant amount” is— (a) the amount foregone with respect to the employment-related benefit, less (b) any part of the cost of the benefit made good by the employee, to the persons providing the benefit, on or before 6 July following the tax year in which it is provided. (5) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), assume that the cost of the employment-related benefit is zero if the condition in subsection (6) is met. (6) The condition is that the employment-related benefit would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions). (7) Where it is necessary for the purposes of subsections (2)(b) and (4) to apportion an amount of earnings to the benefit provided in the tax year, the apportionment is to be made on a just and reasonable basis. In this subsection “earnings” is to be interpreted in accordance with section 69B(5).

Your change, as a redline

203A Employment-related benefit provided under optional remuneration arrangements

(1) Where an employment-related benefit is provided pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for the tax year in which the benefit is provided, and (b) section 203(1) does not apply. (2) To find the relevant amount, first determine which (if any) is the greater of— (a) the cost of the employment-related benefit, and (b) the amount foregone with respect to the benefit (see section 69B). (3) If the cost of the employment-related benefit is greater than or equal to the amount foregone, the “relevant amount” is the cash equivalent (see section 203(2)). (4) Otherwise, the “relevant amount” is— (a) the amount foregone with respect to the employment-related benefit, less (b) any part of the cost of the benefit made good by the employee, to the persons providing the benefit, on or before 6 July following the tax year in which it is provided. (5) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), assume that the cost of the employment-related benefit is zero if the condition in subsection (6) is met. (6) The condition is that the employment-related benefit would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions). (7) Where it is necessary for the purposes of subsections (2)(b) and (4) to apportion an amount of earnings to the benefit provided in the tax year, the apportionment is to be made on a just and reasonable basis. In this subsection “earnings” is to be interpreted in accordance with section 69B(5).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds