Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

289E Anti-avoidance

(1) This section applies if conditions A to C are met. (2) Condition A is that, pursuant to arrangements, an amount— (a) is paid or reimbursed to an employee in respect of expenses, or (b) is treated as earnings of an employee as a result of the provision of a benefit, which, in the absence of this section, would have been exempt from income tax. (3) Condition B is that, in the absence of those arrangements, the employee would have received a greater amount of general earnings or specific employment income in respect of which— (a) tax would have been chargeable, or (b) national insurance contributions would have been payable (whether by the employee or another person). (4) Condition C is that the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements is the avoidance of tax or national insurance contributions. (5) If this section applies— (a) the exemption conferred by section 289A does not apply in respect of the amount paid or reimbursed as mentioned in subsection (2)(a), and (b) the exemption conferred by section 289D does not apply in respect of the amount treated as earnings as mentioned in subsection (2)(b). (6) In this section “arrangements” includes any scheme, transaction or series of transactions, agreement or understanding, whether or not legally enforceable.

Your change, as a redline

289E Anti-avoidance

(1) This section applies if conditions A to C are met. (2) Condition A is that, pursuant to arrangements, an amount— (a) is paid or reimbursed to an employee in respect of expenses, or (b) is treated as earnings of an employee as a result of the provision of a benefit, which, in the absence of this section, would have been exempt from income tax. (3) Condition B is that, in the absence of those arrangements, the employee would have received a greater amount of general earnings or specific employment income in respect of which— (a) tax would have been chargeable, or (b) national insurance contributions would have been payable (whether by the employee or another person). (4) Condition C is that the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the arrangements is the avoidance of tax or national insurance contributions. (5) If this section applies— (a) the exemption conferred by section 289A does not apply in respect of the amount paid or reimbursed as mentioned in subsection (2)(a), and (b) the exemption conferred by section 289D does not apply in respect of the amount treated as earnings as mentioned in subsection (2)(b). (6) In this section “arrangements” includes any scheme, transaction or series of transactions, agreement or understanding, whether or not legally enforceable.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds