Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

329 Deductions from earnings not to exceed earnings

(1) The amount of a deduction allowed under this Part may not exceed the earnings from which it is deductible. (1A) If the earnings from which a deduction allowed under this Part is deductible include earnings that are “excluded” within the meaning of section 15(1A)— (a) the amount of the deduction allowed is a proportion of the amount that would be allowed under this Part if the tax year were not a split year, and (b) that proportion is equal to the proportion that the part of the earnings that is not “excluded” bears to the total earnings. (2) If two or more deductions allowed under this Part are deductible from the same earnings, the amounts deductible may not in aggregate exceed those earnings (or, in a case within subsection (1A), the part of those earnings that is not “excluded”) . (3) If deductions allowed otherwise than under this Part fall to be allowed from the same earnings as amounts deductible under this Part, the amounts deductible under this Part may not exceed the earnings (or, in a case within subsection (1A), the part of the earnings that is not “excluded”) remaining after the other deductions. (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a deduction under section 351 (expenses of ministers of religion), and subsection (3) applies as if such a deduction were allowed otherwise than under this Part. (5) This section is to be disregarded for the purposes of the deductibility provisions (see section 332). (6) See also section 128 of ITA 2007 (which provides that where a loss in an employment is sustained, relief may be given against other income).

Your change, as a redline

329 Deductions from earnings not to exceed earnings

(1) The amount of a deduction allowed under this Part may not exceed the earnings from which it is deductible. (1A) If the earnings from which a deduction allowed under this Part is deductible include earnings that are “excluded” within the meaning of section 15(1A)— (a) the amount of the deduction allowed is a proportion of the amount that would be allowed under this Part if the tax year were not a split year, and (b) that proportion is equal to the proportion that the part of the earnings that is not “excluded” bears to the total earnings. (2) If two or more deductions allowed under this Part are deductible from the same earnings, the amounts deductible may not in aggregate exceed those earnings (or, in a case within subsection (1A), the part of those earnings that is not “excluded”) . (3) If deductions allowed otherwise than under this Part fall to be allowed from the same earnings as amounts deductible under this Part, the amounts deductible under this Part may not exceed the earnings (or, in a case within subsection (1A), the part of the earnings that is not “excluded”) remaining after the other deductions. (4) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to a deduction under section 351 (expenses of ministers of religion), and subsection (3) applies as if such a deduction were allowed otherwise than under this Part. (5) This section is to be disregarded for the purposes of the deductibility provisions (see section 332). (6) See also section 128 of ITA 2007 (which provides that where a loss in an employment is sustained, relief may be given against other income).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds