Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

394A Temporary non-residents

(1) This section applies if an individual is temporarily non-resident. (2) Any benefits within subsection (3) are to be treated for the purposes of section 394(1) as if they were received by the individual in the period of return. (3) A benefit is within this subsection if— (a) this Chapter applies to it, (b) it is in the form of a lump sum, (c) it is received by the individual in the temporary period of non-residence, and (d) ignoring this section— (i) no charge to tax arises by virtue of section 394(1) in respect of it, but (ii) such a charge would arise if the existence of any double taxation relief arrangements were disregarded. (4) Subsection (3)(d)(i) includes a case where the charge could be prevented by making a DTR claim, even if no claim is in fact made. (5) Subsection (2) does not affect the operation of section 394(1A) (and, accordingly, “the relevant tax year” for the purposes of section 394(1A) remains the tax year in which the benefit is actually received). (6) Nothing in any double taxation relief arrangements is to be read as preventing the individual from being chargeable to income tax in respect of any benefit treated by virtue of this section as received in the period of return (or as preventing a charge to that tax from arising as a result). (7) Part 4 of Schedule 45 to FA 2013 (statutory residence test: anti-avoidance) explains— (a) when an individual is to be regarded as “temporarily non-resident”, and (b) what “the temporary period of non-residence” and “the period of return” mean. (8) In this section— “double taxation relief arrangements” means arrangements that have effect under section 2(1) of TIOPA 2010; “DTR claim” means a claim for relief under section 6 of that Act.

Your change, as a redline

394A Temporary non-residents

(1) This section applies if an individual is temporarily non-resident. (2) Any benefits within subsection (3) are to be treated for the purposes of section 394(1) as if they were received by the individual in the period of return. (3) A benefit is within this subsection if— (a) this Chapter applies to it, (b) it is in the form of a lump sum, (c) it is received by the individual in the temporary period of non-residence, and (d) ignoring this section— (i) no charge to tax arises by virtue of section 394(1) in respect of it, but (ii) such a charge would arise if the existence of any double taxation relief arrangements were disregarded. (4) Subsection (3)(d)(i) includes a case where the charge could be prevented by making a DTR claim, even if no claim is in fact made. (5) Subsection (2) does not affect the operation of section 394(1A) (and, accordingly, “the relevant tax year” for the purposes of section 394(1A) remains the tax year in which the benefit is actually received). (6) Nothing in any double taxation relief arrangements is to be read as preventing the individual from being chargeable to income tax in respect of any benefit treated by virtue of this section as received in the period of return (or as preventing a charge to that tax from arising as a result). (7) Part 4 of Schedule 45 to FA 2013 (statutory residence test: anti-avoidance) explains— (a) when an individual is to be regarded as “temporarily non-resident”, and (b) what “the temporary period of non-residence” and “the period of return” mean. (8) In this section— “double taxation relief arrangements” means arrangements that have effect under section 2(1) of TIOPA 2010; “DTR claim” means a claim for relief under section 6 of that Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds