Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

398 Valuation of benefits

(1) In the case of a cash benefit, for the purposes of this Chapter the amount of a benefit is taken to be the amount received. (2) In the case of a non-cash benefit, for the purposes of this Chapter the amount of a benefit is taken to be the greater of— (a) the amount of earnings (as defined in Chapter 1 of Part 3) that the benefit would give rise to if it were received for performance of the duties of an employment (money’s worth), and (b) the cash equivalent of the benefit under the benefits code if it were so received and the code applied to it. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) the benefits code has effect with the modifications in subsections (4) to (6). (4) References in the benefits code to the employee are to be taken as references to the person by whom the benefit is received. (5) References in the benefits code to the employer are to be taken as including references to the former employer. (6) Where— (a) section 106 (cash equivalent: cost of accommodation over £75,000) applies, and (b) the amount referred to in section 105(2)(b) (the sum made good) exceeds the amount referred to in section 105(2)(a) (the rental value), the amount to be subtracted under paragraph (b) of step 4 of the calculation in section 106(2) is that excess (and not only the excess rent referred to there).

Your change, as a redline

398 Valuation of benefits

(1) In the case of a cash benefit, for the purposes of this Chapter the amount of a benefit is taken to be the amount received. (2) In the case of a non-cash benefit, for the purposes of this Chapter the amount of a benefit is taken to be the greater of— (a) the amount of earnings (as defined in Chapter 1 of Part 3) that the benefit would give rise to if it were received for performance of the duties of an employment (money’s worth), and (b) the cash equivalent of the benefit under the benefits code if it were so received and the code applied to it. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) the benefits code has effect with the modifications in subsections (4) to (6). (4) References in the benefits code to the employee are to be taken as references to the person by whom the benefit is received. (5) References in the benefits code to the employer are to be taken as including references to the former employer. (6) Where— (a) section 106 (cash equivalent: cost of accommodation over £75,000) applies, and (b) the amount referred to in section 105(2)(b) (the sum made good) exceeds the amount referred to in section 105(2)(a) (the rental value), the amount to be subtracted under paragraph (b) of step 4 of the calculation in section 106(2) is that excess (and not only the excess rent referred to there).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds