Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

554 Attribution of further interest in company

(1) This section applies if— (a) B or an associate of B’s is (apart from this section) to be treated by virtue of section 552(2) as having been the beneficial owner of a percentage of the ordinary share capital of the company as a result of receiving the relevant payment from the trustees of an employee benefit trust, and (b) B or an associate of B’s has, during the period of 12 months ending with the payment date, received one or more payments from the trustees of any other employee benefit trust or trusts connected with the company. (2) In such a case section 552 applies to B or (as the case may be) the associate mentioned in subsection (1)(a) as if B or the associate had received— (a) any payment from the trustees of a trust as mentioned in subsection (1)(b), or (b) where more than one payment has been received from the trustees of a trust, the last of the payments, on the payment date. (3) B or the associate is accordingly to be treated for the purposes of the listed provision as having been the beneficial owner on the payment date of both— (a) the percentage of the ordinary share capital of the company mentioned in subsection (1)(a), and (b) the appropriate percentage of that share capital as determined in accordance with subsection (2). (4) This is in addition to any percentage of that share capital of which B or the associate was actually the beneficial owner on that date. (5) For the purposes of this section a trust is “connected with” the company if, at any time during the period of 3 years ending with the payment date, the property subject to the trust consisted of or included any part of the ordinary share capital of the company. (6) In this section “the payment date” and “the relevant payment” have the meaning indicated in section 552(1).

Your change, as a redline

554 Attribution of further interest in company

(1) This section applies if— (a) B or an associate of B’s is (apart from this section) to be treated by virtue of section 552(2) as having been the beneficial owner of a percentage of the ordinary share capital of the company as a result of receiving the relevant payment from the trustees of an employee benefit trust, and (b) B or an associate of B’s has, during the period of 12 months ending with the payment date, received one or more payments from the trustees of any other employee benefit trust or trusts connected with the company. (2) In such a case section 552 applies to B or (as the case may be) the associate mentioned in subsection (1)(a) as if B or the associate had received— (a) any payment from the trustees of a trust as mentioned in subsection (1)(b), or (b) where more than one payment has been received from the trustees of a trust, the last of the payments, on the payment date. (3) B or the associate is accordingly to be treated for the purposes of the listed provision as having been the beneficial owner on the payment date of both— (a) the percentage of the ordinary share capital of the company mentioned in subsection (1)(a), and (b) the appropriate percentage of that share capital as determined in accordance with subsection (2). (4) This is in addition to any percentage of that share capital of which B or the associate was actually the beneficial owner on that date. (5) For the purposes of this section a trust is “connected with” the company if, at any time during the period of 3 years ending with the payment date, the property subject to the trust consisted of or included any part of the ordinary share capital of the company. (6) In this section “the payment date” and “the relevant payment” have the meaning indicated in section 552(1).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds