Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

554W Exclusions: certain retirement benefits etc

(1) This section applies if— (a) a relevant benefit is provided under a relevant scheme by way of a payment of a lump sum wholly out of rights which A has under the scheme, (b) A's rights out of which the lump sum is paid are, wholly or partly, pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, and (c) the payment of the lump sum is a relevant step within section 554C. (2) Chapter 2 does not apply by reason of the relevant step. (3) If A's rights out of which the lump sum is paid are only partly pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, the relevant step is to be treated for the purposes of this Part as being two separate relevant steps— (a) one in relation to the lump sum so far as it is paid out of rights which are pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, and (b) one in relation to the lump sum so far as it is paid out of rights which are not pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, with subsection (2) applying only in relation to the separate relevant step mentioned in paragraph (a). (4) In order to give effect to subsection (3), the lump sum is to be apportioned between the two separate relevant steps on a just and reasonable basis. (5) In this section— “pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights” means rights, which accrued before 6 April 2011, specifically to receive relevant benefits by way of lump sum payments, “relevant benefit” has the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 6, and “relevant scheme” means an employer-financed retirement benefits scheme (within the meaning of that Chapter) or a superannuation fund to which section 615(3) of ICTA applies.

Your change, as a redline

554W Exclusions: certain retirement benefits etc

(1) This section applies if— (a) a relevant benefit is provided under a relevant scheme by way of a payment of a lump sum wholly out of rights which A has under the scheme, (b) A's rights out of which the lump sum is paid are, wholly or partly, pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, and (c) the payment of the lump sum is a relevant step within section 554C. (2) Chapter 2 does not apply by reason of the relevant step. (3) If A's rights out of which the lump sum is paid are only partly pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, the relevant step is to be treated for the purposes of this Part as being two separate relevant steps— (a) one in relation to the lump sum so far as it is paid out of rights which are pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, and (b) one in relation to the lump sum so far as it is paid out of rights which are not pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights, with subsection (2) applying only in relation to the separate relevant step mentioned in paragraph (a). (4) In order to give effect to subsection (3), the lump sum is to be apportioned between the two separate relevant steps on a just and reasonable basis. (5) In this section— “pre-6 April 2011 lump sum rights” means rights, which accrued before 6 April 2011, specifically to receive relevant benefits by way of lump sum payments, “relevant benefit” has the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 6, and “relevant scheme” means an employer-financed retirement benefits scheme (within the meaning of that Chapter) or a superannuation fund to which section 615(3) of ICTA applies.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds