Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

673 Taxable maximum: income-based jobseeker’s allowance

(1) A claimant’s taxable maximum for a week is determined under this section if— (a) the claimant is paid an income-based jobseeker’s allowance for that week, or (b) the claimant is assumed under section 672(2) to be paid an income-based jobseeker’s allowance for that week. (2) If the claimant is not a member of a ... couple, the claimant’s taxable maximum for the week is equal to the age-related amount which would be applicable to the claimant if a contribution-based jobseeker’s allowance were payable to the claimant for that week. (3) If the claimant is a member of a ... couple, the claimant’s taxable maximum for the week is equal to the portion of the applicable amount which is included in the jobseeker’s allowance in respect of the couple for that week. (4) But if— (a) the claimant is a member of a ... couple, and (b) the other member of that couple is prevented by section 14 of JSA 1995 or Article 16 of JS(NI)O 1995 (trade disputes) from being entitled to a jobseeker’s allowance, the claimant’s taxable maximum for that week is equal to half the portion of the applicable amount which is included in the jobseeker’s allowance in respect of the couple for that week.

Your change, as a redline

673 Taxable maximum: income-based jobseeker’s allowance

(1) A claimant’s taxable maximum for a week is determined under this section if— (a) the claimant is paid an income-based jobseeker’s allowance for that week, or (b) the claimant is assumed under section 672(2) to be paid an income-based jobseeker’s allowance for that week. (2) If the claimant is not a member of a ... couple, the claimant’s taxable maximum for the week is equal to the age-related amount which would be applicable to the claimant if a contribution-based jobseeker’s allowance were payable to the claimant for that week. (3) If the claimant is a member of a ... couple, the claimant’s taxable maximum for the week is equal to the portion of the applicable amount which is included in the jobseeker’s allowance in respect of the couple for that week. (4) But if— (a) the claimant is a member of a ... couple, and (b) the other member of that couple is prevented by section 14 of JSA 1995 or Article 16 of JS(NI)O 1995 (trade disputes) from being entitled to a jobseeker’s allowance, the claimant’s taxable maximum for that week is equal to half the portion of the applicable amount which is included in the jobseeker’s allowance in respect of the couple for that week.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds