Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

87A Benefit of non-cash voucher treated as earnings: optional remuneration arrangements

(1) Where a non-cash voucher to which this Chapter applies is provided pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for the tax year in which the voucher is received by the employee, and (b) section 87(1) does not apply. (2) To find the relevant amount, first determine which (if any) is the greater of— (a) the cost of provision (see section 87(3)), and (b) the amount foregone with respect to the benefit of the voucher (see section 69B). (3) If the cost of provision is greater than or equal to the amount foregone, the “relevant amount” is the cash equivalent of the benefit of the non-cash voucher (see section 87(2)). (4) Otherwise, the “relevant amount” is the difference between— (a) the amount foregone, and (b) any part of the cost of provision that is made good by the employee, to the person incurring it, on or before 6 July following the relevant tax year. (5) If the voucher is a non-cash voucher other than a cheque voucher, the relevant tax year is— (a) the tax year in which the cost of provision is incurred, or (b) if later, the tax year in which the employee receives the voucher. (6) If the voucher is a cheque voucher, the relevant tax year is the tax year in which the voucher is handed over in exchange for money, goods or services. (7) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), assume that the cost of provision is zero if the condition in subsection (8) is met. (8) The condition is that the non-cash voucher would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions).

Your change, as a redline

87A Benefit of non-cash voucher treated as earnings: optional remuneration arrangements

(1) Where a non-cash voucher to which this Chapter applies is provided pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for the tax year in which the voucher is received by the employee, and (b) section 87(1) does not apply. (2) To find the relevant amount, first determine which (if any) is the greater of— (a) the cost of provision (see section 87(3)), and (b) the amount foregone with respect to the benefit of the voucher (see section 69B). (3) If the cost of provision is greater than or equal to the amount foregone, the “relevant amount” is the cash equivalent of the benefit of the non-cash voucher (see section 87(2)). (4) Otherwise, the “relevant amount” is the difference between— (a) the amount foregone, and (b) any part of the cost of provision that is made good by the employee, to the person incurring it, on or before 6 July following the relevant tax year. (5) If the voucher is a non-cash voucher other than a cheque voucher, the relevant tax year is— (a) the tax year in which the cost of provision is incurred, or (b) if later, the tax year in which the employee receives the voucher. (6) If the voucher is a cheque voucher, the relevant tax year is the tax year in which the voucher is handed over in exchange for money, goods or services. (7) For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), assume that the cost of provision is zero if the condition in subsection (8) is met. (8) The condition is that the non-cash voucher would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds