Propose a change

Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

94A Benefit of credit-token treated as earnings: optional remuneration arrangements

(1) If the conditions in subsections (2) and (3) are met in relation to any occasions on which a credit-token to which this Chapter applies is used by the employee in a tax year to obtain money, goods or services— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for that year, and (b) section 94(1) does not apply in relation to the use of the credit-token on those occasions. (2) The condition in this subsection is that the credit-token is used pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements. (3) The condition in this subsection is that AF is greater than the relevant cost of provision for the tax year. In this section “AF” means so much of the amount foregone (see section 69B) as is attributable on a just and reasonable basis to the use of the credit-token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services. (4) The “relevant amount” is the difference between— (a) AF, and (b) any part of the relevant cost of provision for the tax year that is made good by the employee, to the person incurring it, on or before 6 July following the tax year which contains the occasion of use of the credit-token to which the making good relates. (5) But the relevant amount is taken to be zero if the amount given by paragraph (b) of subsection (4) exceeds AF. (6) For the purposes of this section the “relevant cost of provision for the tax year” is determined as follows— Step 1 Find the cost of provision with respect to each occasion of use of the credit-token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services. Step 2 The total of those amounts is the relevant cost of provision for the tax year. (7) But the relevant cost of provision for the tax year is to be taken to be zero if the condition in subsection (8) is met. (8) The condition is that use of the credit token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions). (9) In this section “cost of provision” has the same meaning as in section 94.

Your change, as a redline

94A Benefit of credit-token treated as earnings: optional remuneration arrangements

(1) If the conditions in subsections (2) and (3) are met in relation to any occasions on which a credit-token to which this Chapter applies is used by the employee in a tax year to obtain money, goods or services— (a) the relevant amount is to be treated as earnings from the employment for that year, and (b) section 94(1) does not apply in relation to the use of the credit-token on those occasions. (2) The condition in this subsection is that the credit-token is used pursuant to optional remuneration arrangements. (3) The condition in this subsection is that AF is greater than the relevant cost of provision for the tax year. In this section “AF” means so much of the amount foregone (see section 69B) as is attributable on a just and reasonable basis to the use of the credit-token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services. (4) The “relevant amount” is the difference between— (a) AF, and (b) any part of the relevant cost of provision for the tax year that is made good by the employee, to the person incurring it, on or before 6 July following the tax year which contains the occasion of use of the credit-token to which the making good relates. (5) But the relevant amount is taken to be zero if the amount given by paragraph (b) of subsection (4) exceeds AF. (6) For the purposes of this section the “relevant cost of provision for the tax year” is determined as follows— Step 1 Find the cost of provision with respect to each occasion of use of the credit-token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services. Step 2 The total of those amounts is the relevant cost of provision for the tax year. (7) But the relevant cost of provision for the tax year is to be taken to be zero if the condition in subsection (8) is met. (8) The condition is that use of the credit token by the employee in the tax year pursuant to the optional remuneration arrangements to obtain money, goods or services would be exempt from income tax but for section 228A (exclusion of certain exemptions). (9) In this section “cost of provision” has the same meaning as in section 94.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds