Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
81 Inspection of overseas information systems
After section 54 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29) there is inserted— Inspection of overseas information systems 54A (1) The Commissioner may inspect any personal data recorded in— (a) the Schengen information system, (b) the Europol information system, (c) the Customs information system. (2) The power conferred by subsection (1) is exercisable only for the purpose of assessing whether or not any processing of the data has been or is being carried out in compliance with this Act. (3) The power includes power to inspect, operate and test equipment which is used for the processing of personal data. (4) Before exercising the power, the Commissioner must give notice in writing of his intention to do so to the data controller. (5) But subsection (4) does not apply if the Commissioner considers that the case is one of urgency. (6) Any person who— (a) intentionally obstructs a person exercising the power conferred by subsection (1), or (b) fails without reasonable excuse to give any person exercising the power any assistance he may reasonably require, is guilty of an offence. (7) In this section— “the Customs information system” means the information system established under Chapter II of the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes, “the Europol information system” means the information system established under Title II of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office, “the Schengen information system” means the information system established under Title IV of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14th June 1985, or any system established in its place in pursuance of any EU obligation.
81 Inspection of overseas information systems
After section 54 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29) there is inserted— Inspection of overseas information systems 54A (1) The Commissioner may inspect any personal data recorded in— (a) the Schengen information system, (b) the Europol information system, (c) the Customs information system. (2) The power conferred by subsection (1) is exercisable only for the purpose of assessing whether or not any processing of the data has been or is being carried out in compliance with this Act. (3) The power includes power to inspect, operate and test equipment which is used for the processing of personal data. (4) Before exercising the power, the Commissioner must give notice in writing of his intention to do so to the data controller. (5) But subsection (4) does not apply if the Commissioner considers that the case is one of urgency. (6) Any person who— (a) intentionally obstructs a person exercising the power conferred by subsection (1), or (b) fails without reasonable excuse to give any person exercising the power any assistance he may reasonably require, is guilty of an offence. (7) In this section— “the Customs information system” means the information system established under Chapter II of the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes, “the Europol information system” means the information system established under Title II of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office, “the Schengen information system” means the information system established under Title IV of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14th June 1985, or any system established in its place in pursuance of any EU obligation.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.