Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
Article 50 Conditions governing applications
1.
The application for a Community plant variety right must contain at least the following:
(a)
a request for the grant of a Community plant variety right;
(b)
identification of the botanical taxon;
(c)
information identifying the applicant or, where appropriate, the joint applicants;
(d)
the name of the breeder and an assurance that, to the best of the applicants knowledge, no further persons have been involved in the breeding, or discovery and development, of the variety; if the applicant is not the breeder, or not the only breeder, he shall provide the relevant documentary evidence as to how the entitlement to the Community plant variety right came into his possession;
(e)
a provisional designation for the variety;
(f)
a technical description of the variety;
(g)
the geographic origin of the variety;
(h)
the credentials of any procedural representative;
(i)
details of any previous commercialization of the variety;
(j)
details of any other application made in respect of the variety.
2.
Details of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, including the provision of further information, may be laid down in the implementing rules pursuant to Article 114.
3.
An application shall propose a variety denomination which may accompany the application.
Your change, as a redline
Article 50 Conditions governing applications
1.
The application for a Community plant variety right must contain at least the following:
(a)
a request for the grant of a Community plant variety right;
(b)
identification of the botanical taxon;
(c)
information identifying the applicant or, where appropriate, the joint applicants;
(d)
the name of the breeder and an assurance that, to the best of the applicants knowledge, no further persons have been involved in the breeding, or discovery and development, of the variety; if the applicant is not the breeder, or not the only breeder, he shall provide the relevant documentary evidence as to how the entitlement to the Community plant variety right came into his possession;
(e)
a provisional designation for the variety;
(f)
a technical description of the variety;
(g)
the geographic origin of the variety;
(h)
the credentials of any procedural representative;
(i)
details of any previous commercialization of the variety;
(j)
details of any other application made in respect of the variety.
2.
Details of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, including the provision of further information, may be laid down in the implementing rules pursuant to Article 114.
3.
An application shall propose a variety denomination which may accompany the application.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.