Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 61 Refusal
1. The Office shall refuse applications for a Community plant variety right if and as soon as it establishes that the applicant: (a) has not remedied any deficiencies within the meaning of Article 53 which he was given an opportunity to correct within the time limit notified to him; (b) has not complied with a rule or request pursuant to Article 55 (4) or (5) within the time limit laid down, unless the Office has consented to non-submission; or (c) has not proposed a variety denomination which is suitable pursuant to Article 63. 2. The Office shall also refuse applications for a Community plant variety right if: (a) it establishes that the conditions it is required to verify pursuant to Article 54 have not been fulfilled; or (b) it reaches the opinion on the basis of the examination reports pursuant to Article 57, that the conditions laid down in Articles 7, 8 and 9 have not been fulfilled.
Article 61 Refusal
1. The Office shall refuse applications for a Community plant variety right if and as soon as it establishes that the applicant: (a) has not remedied any deficiencies within the meaning of Article 53 which he was given an opportunity to correct within the time limit notified to him; (b) has not complied with a rule or request pursuant to Article 55 (4) or (5) within the time limit laid down, unless the Office has consented to non-submission; or (c) has not proposed a variety denomination which is suitable pursuant to Article 63. 2. The Office shall also refuse applications for a Community plant variety right if: (a) it establishes that the conditions it is required to verify pursuant to Article 54 have not been fulfilled; or (b) it reaches the opinion on the basis of the examination reports pursuant to Article 57, that the conditions laid down in Articles 7, 8 and 9 have not been fulfilled.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.