Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 63 Variety denomination
1 Where a Community plant variety right is granted, the Office shall approve, for the variety in question, the variety denomination proposed by the applicant pursuant to Article 50 (3), if it considers, on the basis of the examination made pursuant to the second sentence of Article 54 (1), that this denomination is suitable. 2. A variety denomination is suitable, if there is no impediment pursuant to paragraphs 3 or 4 of this Article. 3. There is an impediment for the designation of a variety denomination where: (a) its use in the territory of the Community is precluded by the prior right of a third party; (b) it may commonly cause its users difficulties as regards recognition or reproduction; (c) it is identical or may be confused with a variety denomination under which another variety of the same or of a closely related species is entered in an official register of plant varieties or under which material of another variety has been marketed in a Member State or in a Member of the International Unit for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, unless the other variety no longer remains in existence and its denomination has acquired no special significance; (d) it is identical or may be confused with other designations which are commonly used for the marketing of goods or which have to be kept free under other legislation; (e) it is liable to give offence in one of the Member States or is contrary to public policy; (f) it is liable to mislead or to cause confusion concerning the characteristics, the value or the identity of the variety, or the identity of the breeder or any other party to proceedings. 4. There is another impediment where, in the case of a variety which has already been entered: (a) in one of the Member States; or (b) in a Member of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants; or (c) in another State for which it has been established in a Community act that varieties are evaluated there under rules which are equivalent to those laid down in the Directives on common catalogues; in an official register of plant varieties or material thereof and has been marketed there for commercial purposes, and the proposed variety denomination differs from that which has been registered or used there, unless the latter one is the object of an impediment pursuant to paragraph 3. 5. The Office shall publish the species which it considers ‘closely related’ within the meaning of paragraph 3 (c).
Article 63 Variety denomination
1 Where a Community plant variety right is granted, the Office shall approve, for the variety in question, the variety denomination proposed by the applicant pursuant to Article 50 (3), if it considers, on the basis of the examination made pursuant to the second sentence of Article 54 (1), that this denomination is suitable. 2. A variety denomination is suitable, if there is no impediment pursuant to paragraphs 3 or 4 of this Article. 3. There is an impediment for the designation of a variety denomination where: (a) its use in the territory of the Community is precluded by the prior right of a third party; (b) it may commonly cause its users difficulties as regards recognition or reproduction; (c) it is identical or may be confused with a variety denomination under which another variety of the same or of a closely related species is entered in an official register of plant varieties or under which material of another variety has been marketed in a Member State or in a Member of the International Unit for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, unless the other variety no longer remains in existence and its denomination has acquired no special significance; (d) it is identical or may be confused with other designations which are commonly used for the marketing of goods or which have to be kept free under other legislation; (e) it is liable to give offence in one of the Member States or is contrary to public policy; (f) it is liable to mislead or to cause confusion concerning the characteristics, the value or the identity of the variety, or the identity of the breeder or any other party to proceedings. 4. There is another impediment where, in the case of a variety which has already been entered: (a) in one of the Member States; or (b) in a Member of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants; or (c) in another State for which it has been established in a Community act that varieties are evaluated there under rules which are equivalent to those laid down in the Directives on common catalogues; in an official register of plant varieties or material thereof and has been marketed there for commercial purposes, and the proposed variety denomination differs from that which has been registered or used there, unless the latter one is the object of an impediment pursuant to paragraph 3. 5. The Office shall publish the species which it considers ‘closely related’ within the meaning of paragraph 3 (c).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.