Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 73 Actions against decisions of the Boards of Appeal
1. Actions may be brought before the Court of Justice against decisions of the Boards of Appeal on appeals. 2. The action may be brought on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the Treaty, of this Regulation or of any rule of law relating to their application, or misuse of power. 3. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision. 4. The action shall be open to any party to appeal proceedings which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions. 5. The action shall be brought before the Court of Justice within two months of the date of service of the decision of the Board of Appeal. 6. The Office shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice.
Article 73 Actions against decisions of the Boards of Appeal
1. Actions may be brought before the Court of Justice against decisions of the Boards of Appeal on appeals. 2. The action may be brought on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the Treaty, of this Regulation or of any rule of law relating to their application, or misuse of power. 3. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision. 4. The action shall be open to any party to appeal proceedings which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions. 5. The action shall be brought before the Court of Justice within two months of the date of service of the decision of the Board of Appeal. 6. The Office shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.