The Sheep Carcase (Classification and Price Reporting) (England) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
19 Authorisation of automated classification methods for carcases
(1) The proprietor of an automated classification method may request that the Secretary of State authorises that method for use in regulated slaughterhouses. (2) The Secretary of State may grant a request under paragraph (1) if— (a) the automated classification method has been subjected to the entire authorisation test process set out in Part 1 of Schedule 2; and (b) analysis of the test results in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 2 show that it has met the degree of accuracy required under that Part. (3) The authorisation for an automated classification method must stipulate the carcase specification and hanging presentation used in the test process for that method and require that all future use of the method under regulation 5 replicates the same carcase specification and hanging presentation. (4) The authorisation for an automated classification method may, in addition to the requirement under paragraph (3), be granted subject to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (5) The proprietor of an authorised automated classification method, or any operators using it for classification under these Regulations, must ensure to the extent they are able to do so that any requirement under paragraph (3) or (4) is met.
19 Authorisation of automated classification methods for carcases
(1) The proprietor of an automated classification method may request that the Secretary of State authorises that method for use in regulated slaughterhouses. (2) The Secretary of State may grant a request under paragraph (1) if— (a) the automated classification method has been subjected to the entire authorisation test process set out in Part 1 of Schedule 2; and (b) analysis of the test results in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 2 show that it has met the degree of accuracy required under that Part. (3) The authorisation for an automated classification method must stipulate the carcase specification and hanging presentation used in the test process for that method and require that all future use of the method under regulation 5 replicates the same carcase specification and hanging presentation. (4) The authorisation for an automated classification method may, in addition to the requirement under paragraph (3), be granted subject to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (5) The proprietor of an authorised automated classification method, or any operators using it for classification under these Regulations, must ensure to the extent they are able to do so that any requirement under paragraph (3) or (4) is met.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.