Propose a change

Gambling Act 2005

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

116 Review

(1) The Commission may in relation to operating licences of a particular description review— (a) the manner in which licensees carry on licensed activities, and (b) in particular, arrangements made by licensees to ensure compliance with conditions attached under section 75, 77 or 78. (2) The Commission may review any matter connected with the provision of facilities for gambling as authorised by an operating licence if the Commission— (a) has reason to suspect that activities may have been carried on in purported reliance on the licence but not in accordance with a condition of the licence, (b) believes that the licensee, or a person who exercises a function in connection with or is interested in the licensed activities, has acquired a conviction of a kind mentioned in section 71(1), or (c) for any reason— (i) suspects that the licensee may be unsuitable to carry on the licensed activities, or (ii) thinks that a review would be appropriate. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) a reason— (a) may, in particular, relate to the receipt of a complaint about the licensee's activities; (b) need not relate to any suspicion or belief about the licensee's activities. (4) Before commencing a review of an operating licence under subsection (2) the Commission shall— (a) notify the licensee, and (b) inform him of the procedure to be followed in the conduct of the review. (5) In conducting a review of an operating licence under subsection (2) the Commission— (a) shall give the licensee an opportunity to make representations, and (b) may give other persons an opportunity to make representations.

Your change, as a redline

116 Review

(1) The Commission may in relation to operating licences of a particular description review— (a) the manner in which licensees carry on licensed activities, and (b) in particular, arrangements made by licensees to ensure compliance with conditions attached under section 75, 77 or 78. (2) The Commission may review any matter connected with the provision of facilities for gambling as authorised by an operating licence if the Commission— (a) has reason to suspect that activities may have been carried on in purported reliance on the licence but not in accordance with a condition of the licence, (b) believes that the licensee, or a person who exercises a function in connection with or is interested in the licensed activities, has acquired a conviction of a kind mentioned in section 71(1), or (c) for any reason— (i) suspects that the licensee may be unsuitable to carry on the licensed activities, or (ii) thinks that a review would be appropriate. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) a reason— (a) may, in particular, relate to the receipt of a complaint about the licensee's activities; (b) need not relate to any suspicion or belief about the licensee's activities. (4) Before commencing a review of an operating licence under subsection (2) the Commission shall— (a) notify the licensee, and (b) inform him of the procedure to be followed in the conduct of the review. (5) In conducting a review of an operating licence under subsection (2) the Commission— (a) shall give the licensee an opportunity to make representations, and (b) may give other persons an opportunity to make representations.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds