Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
109 Inferences.
(1) This section applies where a person is charged with an offence under section 11.
(2) Subsection (4) applies where evidence is given that—
(a) at any time before being charged with the offence the accused, on being questioned under caution by a constable, failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and
(b) before being questioned the accused was permitted to consult a solicitor.
(3) Subsection (4) also applies where evidence is given that—
(a) on being charged with the offence or informed by a constable that he might be prosecuted for it the accused failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and
(b) before being charged or informed the accused was permitted to consult a solicitor.
(4) Where this subsection applies—
(a) the court, in considering any question whether the accused belongs or belonged at a particular time to a specified organisation, may draw from the failure inferences relating to that question, but
(b) the accused shall not be committed for trial, be found to have a case to answer or be convicted solely on the basis of the inferences.
(5) Subject to any directions by the court, evidence tending to establish the failure may be given before or after evidence tending to establish the fact which the accused is alleged to have failed to mention.
Your change, as a redline
109 Inferences.
(1) This section applies where a person is charged with an offence under section 11.
(2) Subsection (4) applies where evidence is given that—
(a) at any time before being charged with the offence the accused, on being questioned under caution by a constable, failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and
(b) before being questioned the accused was permitted to consult a solicitor.
(3) Subsection (4) also applies where evidence is given that—
(a) on being charged with the offence or informed by a constable that he might be prosecuted for it the accused failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and
(b) before being charged or informed the accused was permitted to consult a solicitor.
(4) Where this subsection applies—
(a) the court, in considering any question whether the accused belongs or belonged at a particular time to a specified organisation, may draw from the failure inferences relating to that question, but
(b) the accused shall not be committed for trial, be found to have a case to answer or be convicted solely on the basis of the inferences.
(5) Subject to any directions by the court, evidence tending to establish the failure may be given before or after evidence tending to establish the fact which the accused is alleged to have failed to mention.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.