Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
77 Possession: onus of proof.
(1) This section applies to a trial on indictment for a scheduled offence where the accused is charged with possessing an article in such circumstances as to constitute an offence under any of the enactments listed in subsection (3).
(2) If it is proved that the article—
(a) was on any premises at the same time as the accused, or
(b) was on premises of which the accused was the occupier or which he habitually used otherwise than as a member of the public,
the court may assume that the accused possessed (and, if relevant, knowingly possessed) the article, unless he proves that he did not know of its presence on the premises or that he had no control over it.
(3) The following are the offences mentioned in subsection (1)—
The Explosive Substances Act 1883
Section 3, so far as relating to subsection (1)(b) thereof (possessing explosive with intent to endanger life or cause serious damage to property).
Section 4 (possessing explosive in suspicious circumstances).
The Protection of the Person and Property Act (Northern Ireland) 1969
Section 2 (possessing petrol bomb, &c. in suspicious circumstances).
The Firearms (Northern Ireland) Order 2004
Article 45(1)(manufacturing, dealing in or possessing certain weapons, etc.).
Article 58(1)(possessing firearm or ammunition with intent to endanger life or cause serious damage to property).
Article 59(2)(possessing firearm or imitation firearm at time of committing, or being arrested for, a specified offence).
Article 63(1), (2) or (4)(possession of a firearm or ammunition by a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment, &c.).
Article 64 (possessing firearm or ammunition in suspicious circumstances).
Your change, as a redline
77 Possession: onus of proof.
(1) This section applies to a trial on indictment for a scheduled offence where the accused is charged with possessing an article in such circumstances as to constitute an offence under any of the enactments listed in subsection (3).
(2) If it is proved that the article—
(a) was on any premises at the same time as the accused, or
(b) was on premises of which the accused was the occupier or which he habitually used otherwise than as a member of the public,
the court may assume that the accused possessed (and, if relevant, knowingly possessed) the article, unless he proves that he did not know of its presence on the premises or that he had no control over it.
(3) The following are the offences mentioned in subsection (1)—
The Explosive Substances Act 1883
Section 3, so far as relating to subsection (1)(b) thereof (possessing explosive with intent to endanger life or cause serious damage to property).
Section 4 (possessing explosive in suspicious circumstances).
The Protection of the Person and Property Act (Northern Ireland) 1969
Section 2 (possessing petrol bomb, &c. in suspicious circumstances).
The Firearms (Northern Ireland) Order 2004
Article 45(1)(manufacturing, dealing in or possessing certain weapons, etc.).
Article 58(1)(possessing firearm or ammunition with intent to endanger life or cause serious damage to property).
Article 59(2)(possessing firearm or imitation firearm at time of committing, or being arrested for, a specified offence).
Article 63(1), (2) or (4)(possession of a firearm or ammunition by a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment, &c.).
Article 64 (possessing firearm or ammunition in suspicious circumstances).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.