Competition Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
31 Decisions following an investigation.
(1) If as a result of an investigation the CMA proposes to make a decision, the CMA must— (a) give written notice to the person (or persons) likely to be affected by the proposed decision; and (b) give that person (or those persons) an opportunity to make representations. (2) For the purposes of this section and sections 31A and 31B “decision” means a decision of the CMA — (a) that the Chapter I prohibition has been infringed; or (b) that the Chapter II prohibition has been infringed; (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31 Decisions following an investigation.
(1) If as a result of an investigation the CMA proposes to make a decision, the CMA must— (a) give written notice to the person (or persons) likely to be affected by the proposed decision; and (b) give that person (or those persons) an opportunity to make representations. (2) For the purposes of this section and sections 31A and 31B “decision” means a decision of the CMA — (a) that the Chapter I prohibition has been infringed; or (b) that the Chapter II prohibition has been infringed; (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.