Competition Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
49C Approval of redress schemes by the CMA
(1) A person may apply to the CMA for approval of a redress scheme. (2) The CMA may consider an application before the infringement decision to which the redress scheme relates has been made, but may approve the scheme only— (a) after that decision has been made, or (b) in the case of a decision of the CMA, at the same time as that decision is made. (3) In deciding whether to approve a redress scheme, the CMA may take into account the amount or value of compensation offered under the scheme. (4) The CMA may approve a redress scheme under subsection (2)(b) subject to a condition or conditions requiring the provision of further information about the operation of the scheme (including about the amount or value of compensation to be offered under the scheme or how this will be determined). (5) If the CMA approves a redress scheme subject to such a condition, it may— (a) approve the scheme subject to other conditions; (b) withdraw approval from the scheme if any conditions imposed under subsection (4) or paragraph (a) are not met; (c) approve a redress scheme as a replacement for the original scheme (but may not approve that scheme subject to conditions). (6) An approved scheme may not be varied by the CMA or the compensating party. (7) But, where the CMA approves a redress scheme subject to a condition of the kind mentioned in subsection (4), subsection (6) does not prevent further information provided in accordance with the condition from forming part of the terms of the scheme. (8) The Secretary of State may make regulations relating to the approval of redress schemes, and the regulations may in particular— (a) make provision as to the procedure governing an application for approval of a redress scheme, including the information to be provided with the application; (b) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if it has been devised according to a process specified in the regulations; (c) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if it is in a form, or contains terms, specified in the regulations (which may include terms requiring a settlement agreement under the scheme to be in a form, or contain terms, specified in the regulations); (d) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if (so far as the CMA can judge from facts known to it) the scheme is intended to be administered in a manner specified in the regulations; (e) describe factors which the CMA may or must take into account, or may not take into account, in deciding whether to approve a redress scheme. (9) The CMA must publish guidance with regard to— (a) applications for approval of redress schemes, (b) the approval of redress schemes, and (c) the enforcement of approved schemes, and in particular as to the criteria which the CMA intends to adopt in deciding whether to bring proceedings under section 49E(4). (10) Guidance under subsection (9) must be approved by the Secretary of State before it is published. (11) In this section and sections 49D and 49E— “approved scheme” means a redress scheme approved by the CMA, “compensating party” means a person offering compensation under an approved scheme, “infringement decision” means a decision of the CMA that the Chapter I prohibition or the Chapter II prohibition has been infringed, and “redress scheme” means a scheme under which a person offers compensation in consequence of an infringement decision made in respect of that person. (12) For the purposes of this section and section 49E, “compensation”— (a) may be monetary or non-monetary, and (b) may be offered to persons who have not suffered a loss as a result of the infringement decision to which the redress scheme relates.
49C Approval of redress schemes by the CMA
(1) A person may apply to the CMA for approval of a redress scheme. (2) The CMA may consider an application before the infringement decision to which the redress scheme relates has been made, but may approve the scheme only— (a) after that decision has been made, or (b) in the case of a decision of the CMA, at the same time as that decision is made. (3) In deciding whether to approve a redress scheme, the CMA may take into account the amount or value of compensation offered under the scheme. (4) The CMA may approve a redress scheme under subsection (2)(b) subject to a condition or conditions requiring the provision of further information about the operation of the scheme (including about the amount or value of compensation to be offered under the scheme or how this will be determined). (5) If the CMA approves a redress scheme subject to such a condition, it may— (a) approve the scheme subject to other conditions; (b) withdraw approval from the scheme if any conditions imposed under subsection (4) or paragraph (a) are not met; (c) approve a redress scheme as a replacement for the original scheme (but may not approve that scheme subject to conditions). (6) An approved scheme may not be varied by the CMA or the compensating party. (7) But, where the CMA approves a redress scheme subject to a condition of the kind mentioned in subsection (4), subsection (6) does not prevent further information provided in accordance with the condition from forming part of the terms of the scheme. (8) The Secretary of State may make regulations relating to the approval of redress schemes, and the regulations may in particular— (a) make provision as to the procedure governing an application for approval of a redress scheme, including the information to be provided with the application; (b) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if it has been devised according to a process specified in the regulations; (c) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if it is in a form, or contains terms, specified in the regulations (which may include terms requiring a settlement agreement under the scheme to be in a form, or contain terms, specified in the regulations); (d) provide that the CMA may approve a redress scheme only if (so far as the CMA can judge from facts known to it) the scheme is intended to be administered in a manner specified in the regulations; (e) describe factors which the CMA may or must take into account, or may not take into account, in deciding whether to approve a redress scheme. (9) The CMA must publish guidance with regard to— (a) applications for approval of redress schemes, (b) the approval of redress schemes, and (c) the enforcement of approved schemes, and in particular as to the criteria which the CMA intends to adopt in deciding whether to bring proceedings under section 49E(4). (10) Guidance under subsection (9) must be approved by the Secretary of State before it is published. (11) In this section and sections 49D and 49E— “approved scheme” means a redress scheme approved by the CMA, “compensating party” means a person offering compensation under an approved scheme, “infringement decision” means a decision of the CMA that the Chapter I prohibition or the Chapter II prohibition has been infringed, and “redress scheme” means a scheme under which a person offers compensation in consequence of an infringement decision made in respect of that person. (12) For the purposes of this section and section 49E, “compensation”— (a) may be monetary or non-monetary, and (b) may be offered to persons who have not suffered a loss as a result of the infringement decision to which the redress scheme relates.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.